Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amateur Transplants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Feel free to boldly merge things. —Cleared as filed. 05:33, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Amateur Transplants and Fitness to Practice

• del nonnotable band and their downloadable album, however charitable they ae. mikka (t) 23:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete r3m0t ^talk 00:10, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Thephotoman 03:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge and Redirect to London Underground (song). The song is very notable, something of a pop-culture phenomenon/fad in the UK, i think the band is notable enough to get an article, but failing that at least merge the information into the article for the song. Jdcooper 19:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• 'Keep' or 'Merge and Redirect' to London Underground (song) or Fitness to Practice album not completely downloadable. Relevant to people with medical background. ged3000
• Keep or Merge and Redirect Rob 14:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or Merge and Redirect to London Underground (song) or Fitness to Practice, per Jdcooper. While I see the significance of "London Underground" in a part of the Interweb to warrant a keep, I find it more fitting to simply merge the artist's article to the album's article, unless there is something about the artists themselves that is noteworthy and notable of mention. ╫ 25 ^ring-a-ding 15:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC) ╫
• Speedy delete the band as nn-band, and keep the song. Stifle 23:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Seems crazy you're suggesting it should be deleted because they have a 'downloadable album'. What a piece of nonsense - I thought Wiki would be promoting the use of the internet? KJC.
• Merge and redirect The JPS 12:44, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.