Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanpour

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was del. mikka (t) 03:54, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Amanpour

This article was created by an anonymous user whose previous contributions have all been vandalism. It documents a made-up philosphy, and looks to me like just a new form of vandalism. Michael L. Kaufman 17:10, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 06:47, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as nonsense, and possibly replace with a redirect to Christiane Amanpour. If I'd come across this before it was listed for AFD, I would've just redirected it that way without a second thought. Aquillion 07:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• del. nonverifiable. mikka (t) 08:27, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Don't see any need to replace with a redirect to Christiane Amanpour. Dlyons493 10:21, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete in no way is this a new philosophy, it is a poor oversimplification of a very worn track. Alf ^melmac 11:17, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete — Couldn't find a match on this "philosophy" in google. Appears to be original research. — RJH 15:26, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect. "Amanpour" is a very logical redirect to me. / Peter ^Isotalo 15:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Maybe create a page on Stoner philosophy and put it there. On second thoughts, maybe not. -- Last Malthusian 15:38, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and then redirect to Christian Amanpour, as this would be logical and the article now is not. Geogre 21:11, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete; looks like an elaborate hoax. Owen× ☎ 21:29, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete if I am allowed to vote on my own nomination. Michael L. Kaufman 03:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.