Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Keithism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE —Whouk (talk) 08:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alexander Keithism

It's not quite patent nonsense, but this is clearly non-notable. 0 Google hits for this joke religion. It sounds fun, but it's not encyclopedic. Scientizzle 23:27, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom Yanksox 23:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Delete and Move to bjaodn. --Tjstrf 23:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per nom. Anger22 23:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

I obviously strongly disagree. Obviously this is POV, but this group has over 100 members. I would be willing to change the entry to call it an organisation rather than a religion, but it still has the right to exist on this website. I'm sure there are hundreds of cults listed on this site, and this situation is no different. Easter rising 23:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Easter rising (talk • contribs) .

It "has the right to exist on this website"? No. Nothing has the "right" to an article. -- Scientizzle 23:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per assertion of author (above) that religion only has 100 members, coupled with nominator's google results.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:41, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for reasons provided already. DVD+ R/W 23:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

You know what. Having read your above link, you are absolutely right... for now! Once it is big enough, we'll be back. Otherwise, no need to be rude. I have actually put ALOT (read: too much) time into this stupid religion thing. Obviously I needed to read more wikipedia policy. I appologise in advance, bu I will probably re-post it one more time later just to show some friends, otherwise, I lay the issue to rest. Delete away.Easter rising 23:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Comment. That is truly refreshing. Please understand--there is nothing personal in this. It's just that this is an encyclopedia. Please stick around and don't let this leave too bad a taste in your mouth--oh, and please don't repost the article.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:51, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete religioncruft. Danny Lilithborne 01:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per scientizzle, and only 100 members. M1ss1ontomars2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 22:27, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.