Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adolph Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenberdorf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Adolph Wolfeschlegelsteinhausenberdorf

Delete - Not verifiable Tschild 15:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as not verifiable and not credible hoax, and not verified as a notable hoax, either. Kusma (討論) 15:24, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - John Jacob Jingleheimerschmidt wannabe. Ruby 16:01, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable. Punkmorten 17:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Latinus 18:16, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• his Christian names were Adolf, Blaine, Charles, David, Earl, Frederick, Gerald, Hubert, Irvin, John, Kenneth, Lloyd, Martin, Nero, Oliver, Paul, Quincy, Randolph, Sherman, Thomas, Uncas, Victor, William, Xerxes, Yancy, Zeus. How many of those names are well known in Germany I wonder.....Delete Jcuk 18:34, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
  • "Adolf David Hubert Martin Nero Oliver Paul Thomas Victor Zeus". 10 out of 26, including borderline "Nero" and "Zeus". Kusma (討論) 18:44, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless it can be really verified. Note that his only claim to notability is his exotic name. I can understand that Swedish Bbbxxcrznmm11116 guy or whatever and Hath Christ not died for thee thou wouldst be damned, the son of a priest, but this sounds made up. JIP | Talk 19:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: I'm pretty sure I read about the subject in the Guinness Book of World Records (an edition published circa 1980). However, I'm kind of skeptical that the name given was truly the man's name. Supposedly at the time of publication, the man had decided to use the surname "Wolfe+585" instead (his surname was supposedly 590 letters long in total). --Metropolitan90 01:41, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-23 19:06Z
• Delete as unverifiable, probable WP:BALLS. Stifle 00:24, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I have left a note at Talk:Nihilartikel about this; if this is a real hoax in the Guinness Book, it might be worth mentioning in Nihilartikel. Kusma (討論) 01:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, possible hoax/urban legend. incog 01:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.