Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AIDS Wolf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] AIDS Wolf

No evidence of notability per WP:MUSIC Nv8200p talk 03:39, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Even though Pitchfork didn't like them being reviewed by the foremost hipster webzine makes them notable, no? ~ trialsanderrors 03:53, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per existence of multiple non-trivial works featuring AIDS Wolf. This fulfills WP:BAND. [1][2]. They also seem to be more than your neighbor's garage band who plays at the bar on friday nights. AdamBiswanger1 04:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The cited sources are enough for me. --djrobgordon 04:03, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per the above. A bit unpleasant tho'.Ac@osr 07:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Also recently did a European tour [3] and are on Skin Graft Records, a notable independent label. Kellen ^T 09:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Toured on 2 continents, released record on notable indie label which received press coverage from established sources (Pitchfork, The Wire, etc). Dancarney 23:49, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per WP:MUSIC, "Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country" I'm pretty sure two continents should cover that. Yanksox ^(talk) 03:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable enough, well written aricle, little stuff is cheap. Joeyramoney 17:20, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.