Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A2NWO

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Ezeu 04:27, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] A2NWO

Local wrestling cruft. Gets less than 250 hits on google. Seems a little "inside". Burgwerworldz 10:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom as nn. Unverifiable, no citations, looks like original research. Tychocat 11:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per Tychocat ---Benjaminstewart05:-) 11:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:V, WP:NN, and WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk 11:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Rename This article truly should be redirected to Circle Too Productions

article is varifiable and true. You can find information about A2NWO at various websites including, but not limited to, http://www.a2nwo.com, http://www.nwawisconsin.com/shop/, and several message boards where Will "The Thrill" Sentowski frequents. To members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling would disagree that this is WP:NN because it is a legitimate article that is common knowledge among wrestling fans in the Green Bay-Appleton television market.

From WP:NN:

Criteria for products and services A product or service is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:

1. The product or service has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company itself.
   • This criterion excludes:
     • Media re-prints of press releases, other publications where the company or corporation talks about its products or services, and advertising for the product or service. Newspaper stories that do not credit a reporter or a news service and simply present company news in an uncritical or positive way may be treated as press releases unless there is evidence to the contrary.
     • Trivial coverage, such as simple price listings in product catalogues.
   • This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations. ⁷
2. The product or service is so well-known that its trademark has suffered from genericization.

Again... go to http://www.nwawisconsin.com/shop/ and look at a closeup view of the video covers... Every one of them mentions of Circle Too Productions. They have well over 50 legitimate and copywritten videotapes, photographs, booklets, and television commercials, beyond the continuing existance of NWA Wisconsin. I will admit that A2NWO is a bit more 'inside', hence the recommendation of a page move.

-- NickSentowski 17:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

This article starts with "A2NWO is a group of friends", there's hundreds of independent federations out there, they can't all have their own articles and put stuff about their own angles and such. Your argument is hardly convincing and by your context, I could have a public access TV show for 5 weeks and I'd be entitled to an article here. --Burgwerworldz 01:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete -- minor local organization, barely a step above a backyard wrestling promo. Haikupoet 04:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is minor in the scope of things and should either be a part of another article... otherwise it has no placeNegroSuave 17:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.