Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/91X Top 91 of 2003
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCDe✉ 00:14, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 91X Top 91 of 2003
Non notable. If we start allowing radio station top x of x, we're going to end up with alot of crap. So many stations. Too unwieldly. Woohookitty(cat scratches) 00:02, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- This is just a numbered list of songs. No context. Delete. Christopher Parham (talk) 00:29, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I did propose criteria for broadcasting notability, but it hasn't gotten much attention. -- Kjkolb 01:43, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: How about I take a look and see what I can add? --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 03:46, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete POV list. Gazpacho 01:58, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --JJay 02:26, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this article. I wish it were more clear what specific radio station this is, though, so that we could be sure to mention that this station did this list. (We wouldn't want to include the actual list there, either, though.) --Jacqui ★ 04:16, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Too obscure, no context, too esoteric. --Dante 04:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Not encyclopedic. Not maintainable. Not notable. --Clay Collier 06:54, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per everybody - Just zis Guy, you know? 08:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete what is this article about? it seems to me just to be a list of songs. and per above. Newyorktimescrossword 19:10, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.