Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/64 (BCC)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 64 (BCC)

'WP:NOT a Birminghham bus time-table' - if that isn't policy it should be --Doc (?) 19:45, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

• delete Non-notable, and on philosophical grounds. Its usefulness is questionable. And this route is singled out for what reason? Mmmbeer 20:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Perhaps a policy revision is in order! Agentsoo 22:17, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - but no need for more policy; we've deleted articles about individual bus routes before, and we'll do it again. CDC (talk) 16:20, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - I could make a case for really notable bus routes (but I can't think what the criteria would be) but this isn't it. If nothing else nobody would keep the Birmingham bus wiki updated. Secretlondon 12:50, 29 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.