Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/4 Good Habits
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Voice of All @|Esperanza|E M 00:53, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 4 Good Habits
Completely idiosyncratic non-topic Graydon Hoare 22:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. - Graydon Hoare 22:45, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Death, I mean delete Molotov (talk)
22:53, 19 October 2005 (UTC) - Weak Keep this is good common sense 130.49.221.74 23:23, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -Greg Asche (talk) 23:41, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. "Good common sense" does not make something encyclopedic. Penelope D 01:16, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, for same reasons as Penelope D. Fourohfour 10:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- Research turns up lots of different lists of "four good habits". Almost all of them are simply the expressed opinions of individual people, and the number four is entirely arbitrary. The only possible subject for an encyclopaedia article that research turns up is a source that states that Mahatma Gandhi had a famous list of four good habits. However, I have not found a second source to confirm this, and such material would belong in Gandhism. This isn't what this article is about, anyway. This article is just an selection of habits presented in a non-neutral way with neither attribution nor sources. Delete. Uncle G 11:50, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Article appears to have been created by a banned user, User:Andrew Lin, in the first place, so is actually a valid speedy (all edits by -banned-, rather than blocked users, are to be reverted on sight) --Kiand 13:05, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.