Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3606 (number)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 00:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3606 (number)

Delete. Utter nonsense. A lengthy page notable primarily for containing virtually no information relevant to its title. --Russ Blau (talk) 21:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Huh? I mean Delete as nonsense. I can't believe someone wasted this much time. Fan1967 22:14, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete obvious nonsense Gwernol 22:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete did you remember to celebrate March 6? It's more important than Valentine's Day! (Translation: nonsense) Fetofs ^Hello! 23:08, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- obviously a prank. MFago
• delete. absurd. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 00:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as pn Where ^(talk) 00:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete CSD1 kotepho 02:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete CSD1, request for deletion by page creator on Talk:3606 (number): - Rynne 04:24, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

  "I would like to thank the Wikipedia Community for allowing this page to remain online until now. I created this page on 3-6-06 as a special present for my girlfriend and I had expected to delete it earlier. She enjoyed the gift immensely and so this page has served its purpose. Thank you again"

• Delete as nonsnese. --Terence Ong 05:37, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to 3000 (number) which covers the numbers 3000-3999 more than adequately in most cases. — RJH 01:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• This can't be speedily deleted. Criterion G7 (author request) can't be applied as the page was not created by mistake, and there have been multiple contributors, and G1 is for random meaningless words or characters. However, delete per WP:BALLS. Stifle 23:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete since on the discussion page the author asks us to do so! (Wouldn't this have been better as prod?) JGF Wilks 12:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.