Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2005 Belgian urban violence (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:09, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 2005 Belgian urban violence

the page in its entirety is Original Research LucVerhelst 21:05, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment : On reviewing this article, I have come to the conclusion that it should be considered to be Original Research.

A Wikipedia article on crime in a certain country and/or a certain period should base itself on criminology studies, or news articles giving an overview about crime. In this case, press articles on individual crimes must be considered primary sources, that should be analysed and synthesised, and upon which conclusions should be drawn. This analysis, this synthesis, these conclusions are original research. Wikipedia is no place for that. --LucVerhelst 21:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete The whole "2005 CountryX urban violence" series stinks. Most of the events are barely notable nor connected. Medico80 21:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - or redirect to the article about the French violence, an attempt to appropriate reflected glory, or whatever. Original research, and non-notable. Jdcooper 00:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Per all three comments above. --Edcolins 07:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.