Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1 E1 people
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
[edit] 1 E1 people
I don't find this article particularly encyclopedic. Oleg Alexandrov 03:39, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge, as per Radiant, below Oleg Alexandrov 09:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Gibberish. Delete. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 04:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep See 1 E-42 s for comment. I have now spent 1 E1 s voting on these. brenneman(t)(c) 07:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Keep perfectly acceptable. Needs expansion, is all. Grutness...wha? 07:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Merge the entire Category:Orders of magnitude (population), simply because it's more comprehensive that way. Radiant_>|< 08:58, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, and the rest of that category, WP:NOT a random collection of information. There are infinitely many of these pages to be made and the 'features' of each order of magnitude can be (and probably are) already mentioned in their various articles, or on timelines somewhere if the events are related. Nothing connects the articles together apart from a coincidence that they are, approximately, on the same time scale. -Splash 14:19, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete,arbitrary list of groups that have to have 10-99 people with nothing in common (i.e. no context), can not be complete, (and horribly named). RJFJR 16:07, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge per Radiant, not even sure that merged article would be much good to anyone, but I guess it could be and it sure as hell beats this super-excessive granularity. Dcarrano 23:48, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Merge the entire Category:Orders of magnitude (population). JamesBurns 04:21, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.