Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1818 tusculum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 1818 tusculum

1818 tusculum (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This is an article on the adress of a character in a movie, nothing links there and it contains no info of any notability in regard to the film, could even be boarderline OR †he Bread ³⁰⁰⁰ 04:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete I'd say buildings are generally only notable if they have a long standing history. This building is far from that. If someone asserts an importance outside of being a set in a couple of movies then it can stay, else give it a mention in the Rocky article and delete this. —Mitaphane _talk 04:39, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Bignole 05:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete The fictional address (this was the real world shooting location) can be added to List of the addresses of fictional characters, like 77 Sunset Strip and Surfside 6. Edison 06:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Josh Parris#:
• Delete. An address is not notable simply because it was mentioned in a movie once. JIP | Talk 10:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 11:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Unless someone feels like compiling "real life" information of all of the major set locations (and, if anyone can find out things like why they chose them etc) and sticking them into the Rocky page, this is pretty unimportant to the Rocky page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.53.29.52 (talk) 12:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC).
• Delete 1818 tusculum has no meaningful purpose and is only a scene location from the movie Rocky having no encyclopedic content - should not be merged and instead be deleted Gohiking 12:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I thought this was going to be about another of those damn asteroids. Grutness...wha? 06:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This article is way too short and on a subject that does not require a whole article on it. SetofFive 15:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I am the one who expressed concern about deleting this article because it was the sole contribution of a newly registered Wikipedian. I do not see any inherent value in the article, however. I posted a note on the user's talk page (User_talk:Adrian74) just two days ago. --orlady 21:08, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The content on this article should only be a MENTION or factoid in the original Rocky article, if anything. President Rhapsody 08:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.