Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/155 (number)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. - Bobet 16:25, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 155 (number)

• Delete. Unless someone can provide compelling information pointing to this number being especially interesting it's not worth having an article about. If we keep it, why should we not also write articles about every other number? Ryan Reich 20:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Plenty of compelling information, as is the case with 99% of the numbers in the WP:NUM range. Anton Mravcek 22:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:27, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep WP:NUM wants good articles on all numbers to 200, (among other numbers), including good old 155.Obina 15:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per WP:NUM. Proto t c 15:54, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per Mravcek High Plains Drifter 18:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per precedent. -Rebelguys2 19:08, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep- good disamb properties present Astrotrain 20:05, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per above. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 20:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as a real, verifiable number. Now if this was an imaginary number I might vote to delete, but it's real. Cyde Weys 21:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per precedent. Carlossuarez46 21:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Precedent to keep all integers up to 256 at least. Wikipedia is not infinite, but 155 is small enough. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:39, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. There's only one 155. --King of All the Franks 07:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. There is sufficient information. If not, just expand on it! 155 is an existing number, you know. --G VOLTT 20:58, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.