Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Łańcut (vodka)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep or merge. I'll do the keeping, someone else can do the merging.  ;) —Wknight94 (talk) 01:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Łańcut (vodka)

advertisement Anthony Appleyard 19:39, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, not an advertisement. There are two external reviews mentioned, including an international gold medal. If you think there's a POV problem then tag it or fix it. Melchoir 21:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge, I think all the brands of Polmos Łańcut should be merged into the article itself. The articles for the brands are generally not lengthy and as I can see, the links for the brands in Polmos Łańcut are already suffering a red link syndrome. zephyr2k 03:34, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

There are red links because I ceased creating the articles when this one was tagged for deletion. I didn't want to waste my time. I have no problem with merging it however, esp that I'm not going to develop the articles any further. I just didn't want to have red links in the main article.--SylwiaS | talk 17:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Merge per Zephyr2k, good idea.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  04:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Merge The articles about the particular products is indeed a bit short, but without a doubt worth keeping. I think they could be inserted into the main article in order for them not to look like Stubs. Keep up the good work!/Janicz 06:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• keep per WP:BIAS it is a award winning vodka notable to many europeans Yuckfoo 05:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Yuckfoo, promotional language should be dealt with using the editing process rather than deletion whenever possible. Yamaguchi先生 23:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.