Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/'To go' in Romance languages

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] 'To go' in Romance languages

WP:NOT a dictionary. I can't see any obvious potential for an encyclopedia article on such a specific and limited subject. — Haeleth Talk 13:59, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, per nom Tom Harrison ^(talk) 14:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. All of this information is available at wiktionary:go anyway. —Caesura^(t) 15:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 16:58, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete article, and replace with redirect to Monty Python's Life of Brian :p. Bjelleklang 18:01, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• There has to be some place to merge this information, perhaps at the Romance languages article itself. The suppletion of ire with forms from vadere in late Latin is a significant development, and illustrates a strong animus against monosyllabic verbs in spoken Latin. Smerdis of Tlön 05:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
  • The topic is covered on the suppletion page itself. That may be the best lace to redirect this. Smerdis of Tlön 17:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.