Talk:Artuqid dynasty

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artuqid dynasty article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies
WikiProject Turkey This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Turkey, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Turkey-related topics. Please visit the project page if you would like to participate. Happy editing!
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
To-do list for Artuqid dynasty: edit  · history  · watch  · refresh

No to-do list assigned; you can help us in improving the articles in the same category

It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
Map needed
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Turkey may be able to help!

[edit] Comments

[edit] Redirect

(There wasn't really anything to merge at Artukid, so I redirected it. Adam Bishop 21:52, 17 August 2005 (UTC))

That's cool too. Removing the merge-from template here. --Skoosh 00:01, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Move?

Was the move to Artuklu really necessary? Is "Artuk" any better a transliteration than "Ortoq"? It also seems to me that Muslim dynasties are usually referred to as Fatimid, Abbasid, Hamdanid, etc etc...even the Turkish ones, Zengid, even Seljukid sometimes. Why "Artuklu"? Adam Bishop 15:10, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I read your message only today. When one googles Ortoqid, the only hits are wikipedia and its extensions. I could understand Artuqid, Brittanica refers to the dynasty as such, but Ortoqid is definitely alien and distant to the Turkish original spelling of the name of the family (Artuk, hence Artuklu for those of the Artuk), and shocking for a Turkish eye. Osmanli is sometimes used for Ottoman in English too. Artuqid is fine with me as well. Cretanforever

Ok, Artuqid it is. Thanks. Adam Bishop 01:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)