Talk:Artificial vagina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Artificial vagina article.
This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.

Article policies

[edit] Picture

I don't think we really need a picture of a couple sex toys on this page. It's inappropriate for children. -CDClock —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CDClock (talk • contribs) 20:29, 13 January 2007.

I've added the image again. Please read the following policy: WP:NOT#CENSORED. The image in question accurately and plainly depicts the article's subject matter, and I believe it is definitely worth including it. Robotman1974 09:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advert for Fleshlight

Fleshlight deserves it's own article or section.

Please view these results returned by Inventory dot overture.

Searches done in August 2005 Count Search Term 18611 fleshlight

Count Search Term 5316 male sex toy

Count Search Term 8676 sex toy for men

Count Search Term 3450 artificial vagina

As you can see, there are more searches for the Fleshlight brand, than the combined suggested category. The Fleshlight is truely a sexual alternative for men and is not sold as a novelty.

This sounds like a sales pitch. -EdgarAllanToe 20:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
S/he does make a good point though, Rabbit has it's own article. So should fleshlight. Mathmo Talk 15:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

The Fleshlight really gets too much text on the page. I'm trimming it way back. I'd prefer to expand the whole article, but I don't know where I'd find information on artifical vaginas.--Prosfilaes 03:29, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Okay, I've re-worked this article to talk about sex toys and medical simulations, to hopefully remove the emphasis on a particular product. 150.101.214.82 09:10, 22 October 2005 (UTC)