User:Arjun01/Adminship

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Arjun has nominated these users

[edit] Arjun has offered to nominate the following users:

[edit] Arjun is watching these users carefully and may ask to nominate


Ongoing RfAs:

Username S O N S% Ending Duplicates? Report
Staecker 5 0 0 100% 15 April 03:24 No Details
Joebengo 4 2 4 67% 15 April 01:49 No Details
Veesicle 0 2 5 0% 15 April 01:30 No Details
Coelacan 26 0 0 100% 15 April 00:05 No Details
Hemlock Martinis 25 8 1 76% 13 April 06:13 No Details
Fuhghettaboutit 47 3 0 94% 13 April 01:55 No Details
Smcafirst 8 12 2 40% 13 April 00:53 No Details
Natl1 12 12 10 50% 12 April 20:42 No Details
Dgies 66 1 0 99% 11 April 15:51 No Details
J Milburn 47 0 0 100% 10 April 16:03 No Details
Angusmclellan 70 0 1 100% 10 April 13:45 No Details
Mikeblas 31 0 1 100% 10 April 02:12 No Details
Danny 224 75 7 75% 10 April 00:38 No Details
Nmajdan 54 0 0 100% 9 April 16:20 No Details
Darthgriz98 45 0 0 100% 9 April 01:34 No Details

Last updated 11:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC) by Tangobot

[edit] Arjun's criteria

Here is my special little criteria I use when I judge a candidate for adminship, this is not a checklist as it is just natural to check for these things, the criteria is also not written in stone and can be given to exceptions.

  • RC patrol:Always a plus with me, it is not necessary but it greatly helps. As this is one of the duties that admins are generally expected to do.
  • Time: must be around for at least 3 months.
  • Wikispace:Must be rather high, Wikispace is vital, and must be involved in XFD's even if it is just once and a while. Admins can use the "delete" button, so they should understand the process of XFD's.
  • Featured?: Arjun does not judge a candidate badly if they have no Featured material, whether it be portals, articles, lists or pics. However it is always a grand plus. In a nutshell no 1FA criteria will be judged on you.
  • Civility: an absolute must, the candidate should be civil at all times. Admins go through a lot of #*%! which requires a civil outlook and must be calm and not let the vandals/trolls get under their skins.
  • User talk: must be a good total of edits, I prefer admins who interact with other users/admins. The candidate must not be afraid to ask questions.
  • Userpage: must be clean, and non-inflammatory, political views/religious views are okay, just as long as it is not to the extreme.
  • Email: would be a big plus if it is enabled, I would however never oppose if it isn't.
  • Wars: must not edit war, edit warring is counter productive and doesn't help wikipedia at all.