Argumentum ad baculum
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Argumentum ad baculum (Latin: argument to the cudgel or appeal to the stick), also known as appeal to force, is an argument where force, coercion, or the threat of force, is given as a justification for a conclusion. It is a specific case of the negative form of an argument to the consequences.
Contents |
[edit] As a logical argument
A fallacious logical argument based on argumentum ad baculum generally has the following argument form:
- If x does not accept P as true, then Q.
- Q is a punishment on x.
- Therefore, P is true.
In other words, This is right because if you do not believe it, you will be beaten up.
This form of argument is a logical fallacy, because the attack Q may not necessarily reveal anything about the truth value of the premise P. This fallacy has been identified since the Middle Ages by many philosophers. This is a special case of argumentum ad consequentiam, or "appeal to consequences".
[edit] Examples
- "Everybody knows that communism is bad. Senator Joseph McCarthy is hunting communists down. If I dissented from his policy, I'd be supporting communism, and therefore I'd be anti-American. I am a good American citizen, therefore McCarthy's policy is correct.'" x is America, Joseph McCarthy is P, and communism is Q.
- "I don't remember owing you any money. If I do not pay this supposed debt, you will beat me up and hurt my family. Therefore I do owe you some money."
- "You should believe in God, because if you do not, you will go to Hell."
[edit] As a non-logical argument
A similar but non-logical argument has roughly the following form:
- If x does not accept P as true, then Q.
- Q is a punishment on x.
- Therefore, x should accept P to avoid Q.
This is not a logical argument, but a rhetorical one. The truth of the conclusion, which addresses the benefit of a course of action, cannot be determined from the truth of the premises. Logic does not address subjective concepts such as practicality or ethics.
[edit] Examples
- "I support the war: if I did not, I would be ostracized from the community"
- Youth in the United States who opposed the Vietnam War were told that they should not hold such a view, because they would face discrimination from potential employers. While this argument provides a reason to keep an anti-war opinion private, it does not address whether an anti-war stance is logically correct or incorrect.
