Talk:Are You Being Served?
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Television, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to television programs and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject British TV shows, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British TV shows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project British TV shows, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
 |
This article is within the scope of the BBC Sitcoms WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of BBC Sitcoms. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Could we move this to Are You Being Served? with the punctuation. The move function is just to slow on my computer to do it myself. Rmhermen 17:46 Mar 22, 2003 (UTC)
OK, will do quercus robur 17:53 Mar 22, 2003 (UTC)
What's a Jack the Lad? Two Halves, who does not know his British idiom
- Knowing Captain Peacock, it sounds like flirt/adulterer. TheCustomOfLife 22:12, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- This particular Anonymous Coward is told that there is some reference to the laddish behaviour of a young Jack Charlton, though it may be older still.
- I still don't understand it. I should, since my family on my mother's side is half from Birkenhead, but I do not. Mike H 21:27, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
A Jack the Lad is someone (sually a young man) who is a bit irresponsible, cheeky, irreverent. Looking at the article this shouldn't apply to Captain Peacock, but should probably apply to Mr. Lucas. DJ Clayworth 21:35, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
- Yes, Cpt Peacock is by no means a Jack the Lad and somebody's already removed the label, it appears. --bodnotbod 22:15, Jun 29, 2004 (UTC)
Interestingly, I have recently labelled Mr Lucas a 'Jack the lad' in the characters listing, although I was concerned that he was perhaps more of a 'smoothie'? Having now read this talk section I am happy that Mr Lucas, being someone who presumably fancies his chances with the ladies, is something of a Jack the lad. Jaydash - 19.00, 13 March, 2006
Contents |
[edit] Discussion of moving The Pilot Episode to a more suitable name
The article about the pilot episode of Are You Being Served, which is currently called simply "The Pilot Episode", was recently up for deletion, but it was decided that the only thing wrong was the name. Please see Talk:The Pilot Episode to contribute to the discussion on this. --Tony SidawayTalk 22:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
FYI, Grace Brothers was a name of a real department store in New South Wales of Australia until its name was changed into Myers by its parent company
[edit] On "Are You Being Served?: Do you take this man?",
premiered "11-29-1978", Mrs. Betty Slocombe (née Mary Elizabeth Jennifer Rachel Yiddell Abergavenny) (ladieswear senior assistant, Mollie Sugden), referred to her Greek bigamist boyfriend|fiance|fiancé as "dago".
Hopiakuta 19:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Plot summaries
I hate to throw a spanner in the works, but I see people have been creating articles for each episode, containing a plot summary. To quote from Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, "Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a work's achievements, impact or historical significance, not solely a summary of that work's plot. A plot summary may be appropriate as an aspect of a larger article". Perhaps it would be better to incorporate the plot summaries into either this article, or articles for each series. Otherwise I fear they might be nominated for deletion. Cordless Larry 14:19, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that a page for each episode is unneccessary. May I suggest a page similiar to List of My Family episodes, which I recently created, so a small plot summary could be written for each episode. I'm happy to create it if others agree, and the existing episode pages could be redirected. --Berks105 10:54, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Episode list
I have now created this page, and I am redirecting the episode pages to the new article. Once this is done, I will put the Are You Being Served? episodes category up for deletion. A page for each episode really is unneccessary. --Berks105 20:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Minor Characters
Would it be suitable on this list to include a section on recurring minor characters in the series? Such as Vivienne Johnson, who played Mr. Grace's nurse, or Penny Irving, who played Mr. Grace's secretary? What are your thoughts? Erzahler 23:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe they could be tucked in at the end of the other characters. "Canteen manageress" is already there, and she certainly was in a minority of episodes. Rivertorch 04:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Humphries gay?
The below discussion has always annoyed me in this article.
John Inman's parody of an effeminate gay man, offensive to some gay men and women. Inman points out that it was never explicitly said that his character was gay, and creators Lloyd and Croft have stated in interviews that the character was not a homosexual. In fact, Mr. Humphries seemed to be more "on the fence" or bisexual when it came to his sexuality as he showed interest in both men and women, and often took on traditional female and male roles.
To me, it is like insisting "Miss Brahms is not really a Cockney". I mean, clearly viewers were meant to assume that Humphries was gay. Its just that, like most workplaces in the 1970s, he could not really be too explicit about it at work. Claims he was bisexual I do not believe are substantiated by the series at all: I do not believe he ever had a female reomantic partner after all. In any event, clearly its funnier that its never explicitly stated by the show, so stories can always keep throwing hints to the audience and they stay funny because nothing was ever explicitly confirmed. So while we can't say that he was gay, we also can't say he was bisexual either.
And I do not care what Lloyd and Croft have stated - because their show itself never actually substantiated those claims. The article is about the actual show, not the never-revealed back-story of its characters that never made it onto the show. Asa01 02:01, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Interesting discussion. There was at least one episode—I don't recall the title but will post it here if I can find it—in which it was strongly implied that a romantic encounter between Humphries and Slocombe was imminent. As I recall, outside events intervened to prevent their being alone together, and Mr. Humphries was a little relieved but also disappointed.
- Yes, viewers were meant to assume that Humpries was gay, or possibly bi. Since he never explicitly announced his orientation, it's open to some speculation. Sometimes such speculation can be annoying, I'll admit, but the whole topic was such a central part of the show (Is he or isn't he? He is, isn't he? Yeah, I thought so! No, but wait . . . hmm) that it seems appropriate for discussion in the article. As for Lloyd and Croft, whatever their motivations for saying what they said, I think their statements about the characters are also fair game for the article because they may reveal the (good or bad) intentions of the creators. Btw, there's a parallel intrigue re John Inman (not discussed in his article yet, but maybe should be). Rivertorch 03:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- John Inman married his long-term male partner so that has since been cleared-up. I recall similar (but very heated!) WP talk page speculation about a similar character in US series Reno 911! I agree with what Rivertorch says about the specualation being part of the comedy of the series. I felt the WP article was suggesting that the character was positively bisexual; I feel the article should (and should only) state that it was never confirmed. We should make no new speculation in the article (and certainly not reach any conclusion), though I agree we should note that there would presumably have been speculation about the character amongst the viewers of the show. I'll try to fix the wording - but I wanted others feedback before doing that. Asa01 03:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I'm free
I'm not sure if this part of the article is correct:
the workers are noticeably free; each would look solemnly from side to side before saying "Yes I'm free, Captain Peacock."
Specifically, the use of the word "solemnly". I've always interpreted the gag as being that Peacock asks as a matter of protocol, regardless of the obvious answer, and the workers look from side to side bemused at Peacock's "by the book" nature. I don't think solemnly correctly describes their response to the request; I would simply remove it. Does anyone else agree?
- I disagree. I've always the thought that the workers too look to check as a matter of proctocol. I don't think its beausment. --Berks105 10:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- It varied. It probably was a matter of protocol, and they'd look around even if they knew perfectly well they were free, but sometimes they appeared to genuinely check if they were free. (And sometimes they weren't free, as when Mr. Grainger told Capt. Peacock, "I'm sorry, Capt. Peacock. I'm brim-steaming.") Rivertorch 15:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Anti Semitism in Are You Being Served
I didn't want to start making additions to the article, but I feel something should be said here about the open antisemitism of the series in regards to the Mr. Goldberg character. Does anyone know of any references for this? Matt 04:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- To be honest I don't think there was any real anti-semitism in Are You Being Served?, all the characters had the mickey taken out of them at some point, and to say that this would have been anti-semitism in Mr. Goldberg's case I think is unfair. Regardless I doubt we could source such a thing, I've certainly never read it anywhere. --Berks105 10:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it was worth a thought, I don't want to add anything to the article without sourcing, but watching the show the antisemitism with regards to Mr. Goldberg is apparent. The other characters are made fun of but the treatment of Goldberg is especially negative, plus, unlike the other characters, he never seems to "get it back" if you get what I mean. If it could be sourced it would be a useful addition, especially for anyone interested in antisemitism in British culture of the 1970's.
- I don't think that the anti-semitism expressed toward Mr. Goldberg is any more pronounced than any of the other gross ethnic/regional/class/religious stereotypes and parodies presented. There are non-PC portrayals and references throughout the series with the accompanying less-than-tolerant reactions of the staff, including Germans, Japanese, Arabs, Blacks, Greeks, Italians, Muslims, French, Irish, Welsh, Cockneys, Americans, Gays, and even Somerset folk. It is my opinion that all these portrayed stereotypes are meant to be absurd, rather than a reflection of any ingrained prejudices of the authors, actors, and even anticipated audience. jchristopher 01:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Slocombe's hair
Hilarious as it was, it rather surprised me when I first watched the ancient reruns. Wasn't it somewhat scandalous to dye your hair an unnatural color back then, especially to older folk? I mean she obviously wasn't doing it to be punk, but, ... was it supposed to be a bubbleheaded mistake on her part?
