Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/Alex Bakharev
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Threaded discussion moved from oppose section
- I'm all for Admin's open to recall, but I don't think it's wise for Arbitrators to be open to recall. The workload is large, and it's probably one of the most backlogged jobs on-wiki. Having an arbitrator resign any time ahead of their 3 years isnt' good for the process. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 03:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- May I point out to my answer to my answer to the Q3 by Newyorkbrad. If I am recalled I intend to put my seat on the next scheduled Arbcom election. Alex Bakharev 04:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I do not support the idea of "arbitrator recall", as the nature of the office requires some independence, in my opinion. --Danaman5 21:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment did y'all dislikers of recall bother to look into the User:Alex_Bakharev/Recall? I assure you, this procedure does not make it easy for trolls of cliques to recall a really good guy. I's say that by being open to recall Alex says that he will be a good arbiter. Do not confuse American legal system with wikipedia. To be an arbitrator is a dubious privilege (in fact, not a privilege at all!) `'mikkanarxi 05:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose - poor grammar could hinder ease of communication, also don't like arbitrator recall —Mets501 (talk) 02:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment What did you mean by saying Poor grammar don't like the arbitrator recall? (Igny 17:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC))
- Strong oppose. I find the nominee too far away from neutrality and too close to Wiki trolls and Wiki propagandists. Wikipowers abuses by Bakharev haven't been registered, but widely expected among editors who are not fans of Russia. AlexPU 21:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- If I may comment, the above user was blocked for a month for Personal Attacks and disruptive behavour (edit summaries such as this are notable). Alex Bakharev actually unblocked him PREMATURELY, and the user above took full advantage and began editing before the block expired. (Respectevely Block log, Contributions. --Kuban Cossack 16:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
