Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Candidate statements/Emt147
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I'm a relatively new user but very active within Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft. The world is not black-and-white and I believe that some controversial and POV material does belong in an encyclopedia so long as the controversy or the point of view are clearly explained. I think Wikipedia arbitrators need to think like editors, not conflict mediators. A well-written explanation of controversial points of view will add depth to the article. I absolutely draw the line at all hate/racist material however, free speech be damned.
I feel the Wikipedia banning guidelines are entirely too lenient and thus I would be content to work without admin privileges.