From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Support
- Support! [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 00:56, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- Grunt ҈ 01:37, 2004 Nov 18 (UTC)
- Support. -- 172 03:51, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Shorne 04:10, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Strongly support. Theresa Knott (Tart, knees hot) 17:26, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
-
Support. Mirv has earned my endorsement. – Quadell(talk) (help)[[]] 05:08, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
- Support. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 07:17, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. El_C 17:52, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. OneGuy 14:02, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Strongly support. --Tony the Marine
- Support. --Josiah 22:42, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 02:32, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. --jni 13:50, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Sjc 08:05, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. I support Mirv's election to ArbCom. I have never seen Mirv act in a way that wasn't fair and judicious. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:10, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Support. One of (too) few Wikipedians who defend neutrality in practice, even if it involves an unpopular cause. HistoryBuffEr 01:25, 2004 Dec 1 (UTC)
- Support. Good guy. Good citizen. Adraeus 02:34, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. Have been impressed with Mirv's evenhandedness and good sense in dealing with several recent controversies. Wolfman 02:46, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. We need to get behind these people! Brequinda 14:44, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 00:02, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support. --mav 17:57, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Support One of the few that I've seen being active. __earth 04:15, Dec 17, 2004 (UTC)
[edit] Oppose