Talk:Aquilifer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aquilifer article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related task forces (periods and conflicts): Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC–c. 500 AD)

[edit] Link to Signifer

The link to Signifer on this page links back to this page. By the looks of things, a Signifer is a different type of standard-bearer to an Aquilifer, and should therefore have its own page. (fluoronaut 08:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC))

That's true. Moreover, why do we show a picture with a man wearing animal skin, if then in the paper we say the aquilifer did not wear that?? gala.martin (what?) 03:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I was wondering that myself. Any objection to removing the photo? 72.200.132.221 21:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

None at all, I hate poor quality re-enactment photos. I'm removing this and also removing the signifer -? aquilifer redirect since these are not equivalent PocklingtonDan 11:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)