User talk:Apostrophe

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] kh2.co.uk

I have no vendetta towards such a site. I just felt that KH-Vids is much more rich in content than that site is. Don't slap that copyright BS on me, kh2.co.uk has videos and images that violate copyright as well. Every fansite on the net does.

[edit] Approved for AWB!

Thank you for your recent application to use AutoWikiBrowser. I have approved your request and you should now be able to use the AWB application. Be sure to check every edit before you save it, and don't forget to check out the AWB Guide. You can get any help you need over on the AWB talk page. Feel free to contact me with any questions, alphachimp 19:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Usertalk History

I have restored the history of your user talk page. Although m:Right to vanish allows someone to remove the history of their talk page, you are obviously quite active. Feel free to contact me if that raises any privacy concerns (I didn't see any reference to that in the deletion log). Happy holidays, alphachimp 19:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Moving pages

If you want to do something like moving The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy to The Grim Adventures of Billy & Mandy then you really must sort out the double redirects. If you cannot be bothered, then don't move the page. --Henrygb 22:45, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List of films with similar themes and release dates AfD

Hi, you've expressed an opinion in the deletion discussion of this article. I've recently suggested a compromise in hopes of improving the article while keeping both sides happy, and would appreciate if you could revisit the issue. Thanks. --Wafulz 18:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Face Dancer & Jessica

Hey, I'm cool with you moving Face Dancers to Face Dancer, but you're going to have to move all the redirects too! The reason none of us have made that move was because most articles already pointed to Face Dancers. It's not all right to make moves like this and not do the cleanup work as well. Thanks. TAnthony 22:32, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, I'm not saying leaving the redirects is a huge crime, but if eliminating the extra "s" was so important to you, why isn't the fact that like 30 articles link to Face Dancers and none link to Face Dancer? No big deal, though — obviously, it's not important enough for me to spend time fixing it either, LOL. TAnthony 23:05, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

OK, here I am being a dick about Face Dancers, but I didn't realize you were the same person who did the needed Jessica move AND adjusted all the links. Thanks, I should learn to keep my mouth shut once in a while. :) TAnthony 22:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Of couse it's important

Hello Apostrophe. Glad to finally speak to you. Sorry it's on negative terms, but of course my edit is of important context. It relates to the whole point of KH2FM+, which is the expansion of the series. Unless you have absolute backup for your rv, please put it back!

Thanks very much.

[edit] The Order

Hello. It seems that you moved The Order (Silent Hill) to "Order (Silent Hill)" again. I have moved it back for now. If you have a valid reason for why you've moved the article twice I'd love to hear it on the talk page for The Order. Hopefully you can swing by and discuss it before you move the article again. Thanks. --Thaddius 12:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] KH Series

Stop. I provided a source for the promo, and your rved it. I ask that you stop unfairly reverting my edits to Kingdom hearts series. Toajaller3146 22:18, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Yet again. The romance is obvious. Go watch Some KH cutscnes over at kh-vids.net, mainly endings. I will report next time. It does not matter. It's facts. Toajaller3146 17:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] you broke the species template for pokemon

hmm... not much else to say, take a look at solrock for an example. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] N64 Kid

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

I recommend filing a request at WP:RFPP for move protection to stop a movepage war. Other guy has already been blocked for a 3RR violation on another article. Hbdragon88 22:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


No, I don't feel chatty. I just wanted to let you know that you initiated the deletion of one of my favourite pages. Could you at least tell me how I can retrieve the last version before its deletion so that I can copy it on my hard disc? Don't be so destructive in future, it's awful. Whycreateanaccount 19:10, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, you are a great help. Wow. You must be a man. Whycreateanaccount 19:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mojanbo

Mojanbo has been deleted, so merge away. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:08, 27 January 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Varan Kaiju deletion

I just want to know where/when the deleetion thread was held or if it was done on your own accord. If I do not recieve an explination or response within a week, I will revert the deletion (and attempt to clean up the article). Though Varan is a minor Kaiju, he has had his own film (which the information within was not transfered to), and has appeared in several other Toho kaiju productions. -- Majin Gojira 02:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Edit warring

Edit warring of any kind can be a blockable offense, especially when it's highly disputed and when it's over a move. If you want it the way you want it, discuss it. Don't just tell the people who actually discussed the name to "get over it", and if they want to keep it that way, they have to fight you over it, as if your move holds more weight. We actually discussed it, do us a service and not undermine us by ignoring any discussion or decisions. Being bold does not = ignoring every other Wikipedian. - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] King Koopa redirect

If you want to do something like moving King Koopa to Bowser (Nintendo) then you really should sort out the double redirects. If you can't be bothered, then please don't move the page. Thanks! Gene S. Poole 04:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

There's really no need to get so upset, I don't see how the above could be construed as demeaning. As far as changing every redirect goes, obviously you did not, as the double redirect was there. According to the AWB page, one of the two rules of use is to "Check every edit before you save it." Finally, I did in fact fix it myself. Just advising you for future edits. Thanks! Gene S. Poole 04:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
I understand fully, I replied in between your change to your response on my page; I do notice that Bowser (Nintendo) was redirected a half hour after your redirect. Looks like I misunderstood, my apologies. Looks like the bigger issue would be changing everything without getting consensus on King Bowser, but I really have no interest in having THAT discussion. Sorry again! Gene S. Poole 04:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Oh?

The argument for SMD was to use that instead of Genesis, because it is more prevalent around the world than Genesis, and it is the original name.

The argument for Another Code is to use that instead of Trace Memory, because it is more prevalent around the world than Trace Memory, and it is the original name, and it originated in English countries as Another Code first - ie, UK and Australia.

In fact, I seem to have a stronger argument than they had for the Mega Drive, and yet that went through eventually. How is that not precedent? - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

This is a different discussion. Just because you want to ignore a precedent does not mean that it ceases to exist. - A Link to the Past (talk) 04:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] List of Pokémon

Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Wikipedia:Civility and Wikipedia:No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. -- Robert See Hear Speak 21:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vaati

You took out all of the trivia on the Vaati page, while I will never understand why people want to obliterate trivia sections, if your going to make a change like this go to the talk page first, submit your ideas, see how other people react, and THEN edit the article, and for the record, Vaati has earth related powers in The Minish Cap, but no wind based powers, although he almost never used anything besides wind in his other apperances. BassxForte 05:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AWB problem

Regarding this edit you made to Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, the exclamation marks are coded in that manner purposefully so that they are not interpreted as wikitable markup. When using AWB, please preview your edits and ensure that nothing is disrupted. Thanks, Pagrashtak 23:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Almighty House Sparrow!

I saw your demonstration of categorizing the house sparrow. That was funny. Dr. Submillimeter 21:53, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Userpage

Please do not edit my user page without my permission, if something I put on the page violates one of wikipedia's rules just tell me about and I will deal with it. BassxForte 20:55, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Buizel

Please explain what you are trying to do with this page and I'll help Gnangarra 01:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks I've done the move, you'll need to check redirects etc. Gnangarra 01:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] re: Fictional characters that commited treason

Just a point of procedure, but...

Since you put the cat up for CfD, too soon or not, the "Please do not empty the category or remove this notice while the discussion is in progress." statement in the tag still applies.

What you're currently doing could be viewed as an attempt to empty the category.

— J Greb 04:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Appearances matter.
Whittling down the category while it is under a CfD, especially one you called, can be seen by some as:
  1. Working to empty it.
  2. Not caring about the process.
  3. Not caring to work with the other editors.
Left the CfD close naturally, either as is or with you having withdrawn the nom, then go about cleaning it up.
— J Greb 04:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Essentially, yup. Keep in mind perception #2 and #3. It can look like you were going to try and fix the cat anyway, so why CfD? Trying to CYA if someone yelps about a pet cat? Trying to get it down to so few that it's a worthless cat or all but empty and the CfD becomes a fait accompli?
The long and short of it is it looks like an assumtion no faith in the other editors or the community as a whole.
— J Greb 04:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Treason

The article basically analyses the role of treason in the law, it doesn't give you the comprehensive definition of the word, and as you may well know, an English word can have several meanings in the dictionary, WP:WPINAD. The word "treason" is widely used to simply represent the betrayal of trust and/or the delivery of aid to the enemy. Don't use that article as your proof, try looking up the word properly in a dictionary instead. PeaceNT 07:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Username Lover!!!

I LOVE your username as a puncuation mark! ;) I LOVE IT! :):):) ----Invader SoapEvil JokesGir's DogFebruary 13th, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WP:DBZ movie articles/page moves

I see you have taken the liberty of moving all these articles. Im not here to complain or anything, just would have liked to see you discuss this on our WikiProject's talk page before you went ahead and moved the articles. Anyhow, im just here to ask you when are planning on fixing all the bad links and double redirects you've just created? -- bulletproof 3:16 02:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

By fixing redirects, I mean just changing all Broly: Second Coming links, for example, to Dragon Ball Z: Broly Second Coming. When ever you move a page please check the What links here link to see how many bad links and redirects you just created. These bad links disrupt Wikipedia and should always be avoided. Please help correct these bad links. -- bulletproof 3:16 04:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] InvaderSora reported you for violating the 3RR rule

InvaderSora reported you for violating the three-revert war. He also reported you for harassing him/her and says that you deserve the same punishment (a 48 hour block). Note that the user provided no diffs at all. The report is right here. Squirepants101 02:33, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Harssment

I ask you a favor. Stop harssing me. Do you watch my Contrib page or something? it seems every article i edit you jump at. I have already reported you, so you should stop regardless if you are blocked or not. InvaderSora 03:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your user page

Just letting you know a user using his IP adress vandalized your user page, I reverted it so no need to worry. -Dark Dragon Flame 00:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia in ASL

Hi! I'm contacting you because you are in the Category:User ase category; I just wanted to make you aware that there is currently a request on Meta about creating a new Wikipedia edition in American Sign Language, and I would really like your input on the issue, as a native signer. Jon Harald Søby 18:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thank you for stepping in and helping with the recent vandalism on Kingdom Hearts 2 and just so you know I am this close to posting this incedent on the incedent board only because that person's user account at the moment appears to be a single purpose account. -Adv193 06:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Korean articles

I put this on Shabby's talk page and I thought you should check it out as well:

Hi, I noticed you were taking part in the discussion on the Talk:Hwang Seong-gyeong page. I think Bethereds behaviour is ridiculous and something needs to be done to stop his ownership of these pages. He said that he would "change the pages back until the end of time" as he thinks he is right in removing any Japanese reference from "his" Korean pages. There are many reasons why Japanese katakana should be included in these pages (the obvious being that the characters are created by a Japanese company and that every other article includes it bar the few Korean characters). Is there any way to call a moderator or administrator to this debate to stop Bethereds reverts? He seems to have no proper reason as to why he is omitting the information other than he believes Korea is better than Japan (I've read his user page and looked at his previous edits and he seems to be doing anything he can to promote Korea over Japan). Does he not realise that in these games, even Chang and Kim (from KOF) speak in the Japanese language and have never even uttered a Korean word? We need a vote or something to put him right. Thanks. Mr.bonus 16:04, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Succession boxes for fictional characters

I don't really care either way, but the succession box that was added to Belle (Disney) was an out-of-universe one, which isn't the kind prohibited by Wikipedia:Manual of_Style_(writing about fiction)#Infoboxes and_succession boxes, if that's what's guiding your reverts. - Peregrine Fisher 06:29, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Apology

I apologize for any rudeness or sarcasm I made towards you during the edit wars (and as well apologize for edit warring over Trace Memory). - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ultimate X-Men (story arcs): Peer Review

Greetings! In January, you participated in the discussion for the 2nd deletion nomination of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). After two months of rewriting, reorganizing, and referencing, the article is now undergoing a WikiProject Comics peer review. Your editorial opinion would be most welcome to help us improve the article to A-class status. Thanks for your time! - fmmarianicolon | Talk 06:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orginization's Return

I noticed you seemed frustrated about someone adding the thing about being able to fight Vexen again, well, I don't disagree with taking it out, (only Roxas's section should mention the fact we fight him now), officaly, in Kingdom Hearts II Final Mix+ there will be a set of portals which will allow us to fight all of them on the KHII side, really beefed up, this was officaly stated by the developers, so you can't argue with it, you can argue against it being in the article though. BassxForte 22:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

"data"? Thanks for the info. BassxForte 23:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] KH

Why not?--Tempest115 22:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Enigmatic Man

It's what Jiminy's COM journal calls the hooded member that introduces them to the castle. The original game confirms nothing but Re:COM and the manga say it's Marluxia. I'll get a screenshot soon.—ウルタプ 12:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/p/o/User_talk%7EApostrophe_d228.html"