User talk:Apokrif

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

apokrif1 at yahoo.com

Contents 1 comparative polynesian phonetics chart 2 Suicide 3 Article title 4 Vandalism after "last warning" 5 Larry Nevers 6 Careful

[edit] comparative polynesian phonetics chart

hey. can you check and comment on my reply to your inquiry on the Polynesian languages article's talk page? TShilo12 05:00, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Hi, I believe that there is in actuality one police force.--Tombombadil 01:55, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Gendarmerie + garde territoriale + royal police(s) Apokrif 18:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
    • I stand corrected.--Tomtom9041 04:01, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suicide

Hi, I noticed you made some edits to the suicide article. I've created a sample layout in an effort to improve the page. I would appreciate your comments to my proposal. If you're too busy with other stuff, don't worry about it. :) Gflores ^Talk 21:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article title

Actually, we usually favour the common name. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names). "When choosing a name for a page ask yourself: What word would the average user of the Wikipedia put into the search engine?" The average person would most definitely put in MI5. The other problem with using the official name is that Security Service points to a disambig page. Yes, you can add a qualifier as you did, but it makes it rather ugly (particularly using the full qualifier that you did - would UK not have been better?). -- Necrothesp 23:55, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism after "last warning"

If that happens, it's always best to report that to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. That's where administrators can take the appropriate actions to temporarily (or permanently) block or ban the user for vandalism. Thanks for the message; I reported him. Buchanan-Hermit™..CONTRIBS..SPEAK! 19:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Larry Nevers

Hey there. Just here to help you with your recent disambiguation pages - it's best to have them follow the traditional disambig style. I've fixed up Larry Nevers to follow this; it would be helpful if any past and future disambig pages you make look/are formatted similarly. Have fun! (|-- UlTiMuS ^{( U | T | C [] M | E )} 18:27, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Careful

The whole point of Did Six Million Really Die? is that it is not a history book; it's "revisionism" - that is, lies. Adding it to the category of "Holocaust history books" is pointless and invalid. DS 15:44, 18 July 2006 (UTC)