User talk:Anthonynow12
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Contents |
[edit] Good job on Danger Hiptop!
That's really all I've got. Thanks for cleaning the page up. I've had it on watch so I could take a crack at it when classes ended, but you got there first. Good edit! -- BillWeiss 23:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- And this right after I'd taken a less severe crack at it last night. ;) However you removed the image of the original Hiptop I had added. I agree the image quality is not wonderful, but it's the best I had (I no longer have the device, the photo was one I took for when I sold it on eBay). If you can add a higher quality image I won't be offended, but I think we ought to show both versions. Also your edits removed some of the description of the original Hiptop, there are some notable differences between the two versions. -- Hawaiian717 05:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] spam
Regarding Stabilizing Ferroelectric Materials, Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. See the welcome page to learn more. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 02:31, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Future Technology
A tag has been placed on Future Technology, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Future Technology is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}}, and also put a note on Talk:Future Technology saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. Harvestdancer 19:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to Albert Einstein
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Albert Einstein. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Krellis 00:55, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 1,000,000,000 Digits of Pi
Welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome your help to create new content, but your recent additions (such as 1,000,000,000 Digits of Pi) are considered nonsense. Please refrain from creating nonsense articles. If you want to test things out, edit the sandbox instead. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. In addition, PLEASE do not post articles that are as long as the one you just made. Making very long articles makes it very difficult for the page to be read, and could cause some browsers to crash depending on the connection speed. Thank you. Hersfold (talk/work) 18:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Orlando Serrell
Please provide references to information you add to wikipedia. `'mikka 19:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Red Hammer
I don't know, but that page is unsuitable for Wikipedia in it's current state, and it would require a substantial rewrite in order to be kept. --Lenin and McCarthy | (Complain here) 21:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Toxic Waste (confectionery)
A tag has been placed on Toxic Waste (confectionery), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 17:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Paper Wasp (Projectile)
An editor has nominated Paper Wasp (Projectile), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paper Wasp (Projectile) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)