Talk:Antony C. Sutton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article. [FAQ] | ||
Contents |
[edit] karl marx
in his the federal reserve conspiracy he talks about karl marx he says that "the ten points of the Marxian Manifesto, a program designed to overthrow the middle class bourgeoisie (not the big capitalist)"
this is an error on Sutton's part as Marx does not talk much about a middle class, Marx defines bourgeoisie as the upper class the rulers.
This argument on Sutton part seems as a fallacy of redefining words.
I wonder how much or if any more Sutton crosses the line to conspiracy, which i find a waste of time.
[edit] Vandalism
This article was vandalized by someone who made it appear that Sutton's work done at and for Stanford Univ. was just shared with Stanford. 64.229.31.80 14:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- I find earlier versions to be more descriptive, but some of your edits are also constructive, but, imo, bordering on POV. The revision before yours says: He shared his research with the University of London and Stanford's Hoover Institute and paid no heed to how governments, corporations, and political powers would react. I don't see what qualms you have here... If you could combine this current revision and the revision before into one article, that'd be awesome. Copysan 00:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] POV
"sharing with the public an evident life of unmitigated research [...], of passion in answers, in truths regardless of how government, corporations, and political powers would (and did) react." and "he was not one to characterize the notion of respect in acquiescence; thus he continued his research"
This is clearly POV:ed.. More a hagiography than actual facts. Apparatus 20:35, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Another view
There's barely any information in the article. The other people posting seem to be arguing over tiny crumbs. [Sept. 12, 2006]
[edit] "In his own words"
What's the story of this section? Is it an autobiographical sketch? What's the source? It should either be placed in quotation marks or edited for consistency with the other material. -Will Beback 20:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
