Talk:Anthony Chenevix-Trench

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've restored most of anonymous user User:84.64.95.105's edits on the grounds that that the reasons stated for his/her edits are invalid and unsourced. The allegations made by Foot and others are referenced from reputable sources are. The blanket deletion of sources and categories from the article is tantamount to vandalism. As previously written, the article was balanced and well-sourced. User:84.64.95.105's edits amount to hagiography, placed where they are, and though much new useful information has been provided it has been placed in a section which is not appropriate. The change of "Child abuser" to another heading may be justified, but "Controversial schoolmaster" is not it. Emeraude 11:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)