Antifeminism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Please help improve this article or section by expanding it.
Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.
This article has been tagged since January 2007.
The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.

Antifeminism refers to opposition to feminism. It refers to a range of views that either criticize feminist ideology in general or argue that it be restrained. Some critics equate certain neoconservative intellectuals' views with antifeminism, although proponents call the label unfair.

Contents

[edit] Antifeminist ideas

Many antifeminist proponents say the feminist movement has achieved its aims and now seeks higher status for women than for men[1][2][3].

Others consider feminism a destructive force that endangers the family. For example, conservative political scientist Paul Gottfried describes this antifeminist position:

Serious conservative scholars like Allan Carlson and F. Carolyn Graglia have maintained that the change of women’s role, from being primarily mothers to self-defined professionals, has been a social disaster that continues to take its toll on the family. Rather than being the culminating point of Western Christian gentility, the movement of women into commerce and politics may be seen as exactly the opposite, the descent by increasingly disconnected individuals into social chaos[4].

Antifeminist writer James Kalb describes the stance thus:

To be antifeminist is simply to accept that men and women differ and rely on each other to be different, and to view the differences as among the things constituting human life that should be reflected where appropriate in social attitudes and institutions. By feminist standards all societies have been thoroughly sexist. It follows that to be antifeminist is only to abandon the bigotry of a present-day ideology that sees traditional relations between the sexes as simply a matter of domination and submission, and to accept the validity of the ways in which human beings have actually dealt with sex, children, family life and so on. Antifeminism is thus nothing more than the rejection of one of the narrow and destructive fantasies of an age in which such things have been responsible for destruction and murder on an unprecedented scale[5].

Antifeminists often decry what they view as the misandric policies of Western governments. They sometimes point to an increase in divorce and "family breakdown" and attribute as its cause the influence of feminism. They also cite that crime[6], teenage pregnancy[7], and drug abuse[8] are higher among children of fatherless homes, considering that 66-80% (depending on the sources) of divorces are initiated by women.

Opponents of antifeminism argue that although there are correlational data to support a link between fatherless homes and increased social ills, that correlation does not necessarily imply causation and that antifeminists run the risk of drawing incorrect conclusions by sometimes ignoring other possible factors.

Antifeminist comments periodically appear in U.S. political punditry. For example, in a 1983 syndicated column, Pat Buchanan wrote, "Rail as they will about discrimination, women are simply not endowed by nature with the same measures of single-minded ambition and the will to succeed in the fiercely competitive world of Western capitalism."[9]}}

Buchanan and other paleoconservatives argue that feminism is an ideology of the modern managerial state, an ongoing regime that remains in power, regardless of what political party holds a majority. It acts in the name of abstract goals, such as equality or positive rights, and uses its claim of moral superiority, power of taxation and wealth redistribution to keep itself in power.

[edit] Feminists on Antifeminism

[edit] A Debate between Feminists

People such as Camille Paglia, Christina Hoff Sommers and others who call themselves feminists have sometimes been labeled "antifeminists", or holding anitfeminist views, by other feminists[citation needed] for their opinions of perceived "oppression" and for their labeling of beliefs with which they disagree as "gender feminism".[10] Some argue that in this way the term "antifeminist" is used to silence academic debate about feminism, and represents "an enormous extension of women's power, allowing any sort of criticism of either women or feminist ideas to fall under the watchful eye of their ideological guardians."[11].

Feminists such as Jennifer Pozner blast that claim and argue the feminist label is a ruse. In describing what she believes is a method of so-called "rebel feminists" who use "Leftist lingo to gain rebellious credibility in a supposedly politically correct culture", she identifies what she argues is a contradiction: "Become vocally indignant at [other feminists] refusal to tolerate [their] 'dissenting feminist voice'" and then to "Go directly to the media. Do not pass up the college lecture circuit. Do not turn down close to $200K in Right Wing grants" and wait "for the money to come rolling in". She goes on to further counter claims of silencing debate or criticism: "Use your role as 'rebel feminist' to denounce every feminist concern other than women's economic advancement." and "(...)substantiate your claims by using faulty research methods and superficial interviews. Rarely contact the authors, activists and psychologists you libel." [1]

[edit] Antifeminism in Nietzschean philosophy

In Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche expresses his belief that women are naturally more cruel and contemptuous of truth than men, and that the emancipation of women threatens to compromise what he considers these admirable feminine qualities.

Since the French Revolution the influence of woman in Europe has grown smaller in proportion to the increase in her rights and demands, and the "Emancipation of Woman," to the extent that that is desired and demanded by women themselves (and not just by superficial men), has, as a result, produced a peculiar symptom of the growing weakening and deadening of the most feminine instincts. There is a stupidity in this development, an almost masculine stupidity, about which a successful woman—who is always an intelligent woman—would have to feel thoroughly ashamed.

He goes on to write that, "The thing in woman that arouses respect and often enough fear is her nature, which is 'more natural' than man's nature, her genuine predatory and cunning adaptability, the tiger's claws under the glove, the naiveté of her egotism, her uneducable nature, her inner wildness, the incomprehensibility, breadth, and roaming of her desires and virtues," and concludes that these superior qualities can only thrive when women are repressed or relegated to subordinate roles. He attacks the men of his time he sees as "idiotic friends of women and corrupters of women among the scholarly asses of the male sex who counsel woman to de-feminize herself in this manner and to imitate all the foolish things which make 'man' in Europe and European 'manliness' sick, people who want to bring woman down to the level of a 'common education,' perhaps even to reading the newspapers and discussing politics. Here and there they want even to make women into free spirits and literati: as if a woman without piety were not something totally repulsive and ridiculous to a profound and godless man."[2]

Nietzsche also writes that if a woman is "corrupted" by having the same freedom as men, it "make[s] her incapable of her first and last profession, giving birth to strong children." Although Oswald Spengler's own expressed views on women were generally more empathetic and less inflammatory than Nietzsche's, Spengler endorsed the Nietzschean opposition to feminism for many of the same reasons. Spengler also expressed concern that both men and women in Western countries no longer wanted to get married and raise children, claiming this would eventually result in the destruction of Western Civilization. But while Nietzsche argued for stricter societal controls on women, Spengler found it deplorable for either society or the state to force women to meet a "standardized type... in body, in clothes, in mind," which he considered a sign of cultural decline or inferiority[3].

Spengler's concept of "strong race" defined as "the eternal warlike in the beast of prey man," an ethos rather than a zoological notion, was similar to Nietzsche's "Will to Power." Nietzsche considered this a masculine attribute, once writing, "The happiness of man is, 'I will.' The happiness of woman is, 'He will.'" Unlike Nietzsche's concept, Spengler believed women, specifically mothers, could have "strong race." Spengler did not share Nietzsche's rejection of Goethe's notion of an "eternal feminine" metaphysical presence, instead viewing it as engaged in a neverending war with the masculine Will to Power. In The Decline of the West, he writes, "Woman in childbed wins through to her victory." Noting that the Aztecs "honoured the woman in labour as a battling warrior," he views childbirth as an expression of a constant struggle for dominance between the sexes inherent in every healthy culture[4]. When a civilization loses its warlike instincts (between the sexes and against other peoples), he believed, it falls into decline and succumbs to "Caesarism" before eventually falling to enemies with stronger "race." Spengler continues this theme in The Hour of Decision, in which he attacks both feminism and modern misogyny as signs of Western culture in decline.[5]

Much of feminism also conflicts with the Nietzschean view of world history, continued by admirers and emulators such as Spengler, which rejects the traditional linear notion of world history headed toward a greater goal. Because feminist ideology deals with victims and oppressors in a subjective way that sympathizes with the former, it falls under the category of "slave morality." Finally, it is an ideology that revolves around intellectual assertions about relations between the sexes, and thus runs in opposition to the fundamental core of Nietzschean anti-rationalism.

[edit] Antifeminist organisations

As of 2006 the most successful antifeminist organisation in the US is STOP ERA, founded by Phyllis Schlafly in October 1972. Schlafly successfully mobilised thousands of people to block the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment in the USA[12]. It was Schlafly too who forged links between STOP ERA and other conservative organizations, as well as single-issue groups against abortion, pornography, gun control, and unions. By integrating STOP ERA with the so-called New Right she was able to leverage a wider range of technological, organisational and political resources, successfully targeting pro-feminist candidates for defeat[12].

[edit] Further reading

[edit] Literature critical of feminism

[edit] Literature about antifeminism

  • Redefining the New Woman, 1920-1963 (Antifeminism in America: A Collection of Readings from the Literature of the Opponents to U.S. Feminism, 1848 to the Present), Howard-Zophy
  • Un-American Womanhood: Antiradicalism, Antifeminism, and the First Red Scare, Kim E. Nielsen
  • Andrea Dworkin, Right-Wing Women: The Politics of Domesticated Females (1983; ISBN 0-399-50671-3).
  • Susan Faludi, Backlash: The Undeclared War Against American Women (1992; ISBN 0-385-42507-4)
  • Cynthia D. Kinnard, Antifeminism in American Thought: An Annotated Bibliography (Boston: G. K. Hall & Co., 1986, ISBN 0-8161-8122-5)
  • Jane J. Mansbridge: Why We Lost the ERA, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1986
  • G. Swanson, Antifeminism in America: A Historical Reader (2000) ISBN 0-8153-3437-0

[edit] See also

[edit] Individuals linked to antifeminism

[edit] External links

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Wattenberg, B (1994). Has Feminism Gone Too Far?. MenWeb. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  2. ^ Pizzey, Erin (1999). How The Women's Movement Taught Women to Hate Men. Fathers for Life. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  3. ^ Janice Shaw Crouse (2006). What Friedan Wrought. Concerned Women for America. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  4. ^ Gottfried, Paul (2002). The Trouble With Feminism. mensnewsdaily.com. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  5. ^ Jim Kalb (2004). Anti-Feminist Page. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  6. ^ Juvenile Crime In Fatherless Homes, Public Schools. National Center for Policy Analysis (1997). Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  7. ^ Ellis, BJ et. al. (2003). "Does father absence place daughters at special risk for early sexual activity and teenage pregnancy?". Child Development 74 (3). 
  8. ^ The Consequences of Fatherlessness. fathers.com. Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  9. ^ Pat Buchanan In His Own Words. FAIR (1996). Retrieved on [[2006-09-30]].
  10. ^ BitchFest, 2006
  11. ^ Patia and Koerge, Professing Feminism: Education and Indoctrination in Women's Studies, (2003)
  12. ^ a b Tierney, Helen (1999). Women's Studies Encyclopedia. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group, Incorporated, p. 95. 
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/n/t/Antifeminism.html"
In other languages