Talk:Ankh-af-na-khonsu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Egyptological subjects. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information). | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. [FAQ] (If you rated the article, please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
||
 |
Ankh-af-na-khonsu is part of WikiProject Thelema, an attempt to expand, improve, and standardize articles related to Thelema. You are invited to participate by editing the article or by joining the Thelema WikiProject as a participating member. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
Seeing as how there are no sources here, I edited the page for bias.
Zos 04:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Did egyptian priests normally create their funeral stelae themselves? I don't recall seeing this in the Revue article, though I could have missed it. Dan 06:11, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
how about some references from archeologists and anthropologists in this article? After all, if this is the name of a historical persona, then the historical anthropological information should take precedence over the use of the name by a more modern magickian. a few small references to Crowley's use of the name would be sufficient I think to show the connection, but this article appears to be mostly about Crowley.
Indeed, the first sentance has a little information about the actual historical persona, but after that, there is no egyptian historical information at all. If this is to be an article about crowley, it needs to be moved.
--Arkayne Magii 00:49, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- How so? He seems historically important mainly for his connection to Crowley and Thelema. The article includes the one wholly non-Thelemic reference that I know of (not that I would necessarily know if archeologists wrote about him). Feel free to add more information if you find references. Dan 21:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Re the NPOV template: like I said, if you see bias here, add some information on this mythical non-Thelemic perspective. Or explain where the article asserts any POV as fact. Dan 07:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
