Anglo-Saxon Futhorc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article contains runic special characters; to display them, you need a Unicode font supporting the runic range, such as Junicode or FreeMono.

left half of front panel of the Franks Casket.

The Anglo-Saxon (also, Anglo-Frisian) Futhorc is a runic alphabet, extended from the Elder Futhark from 24 to between 26 and 33 characters. It was used probably from the 5th century onward, recording Old English and Old Frisian.

1 History
2 Letters
3 Inscription corpus
4 List of inscriptions
5 Notes
6 References
7 See also
8 External links

[edit] History

There are competing theories as to the origins of the Anglo-Saxon Futhorc. One theory proposes that it was developed in Frisia and from there spread later to England. Another holds that runes were first introduced to England from Scandinavia where the futhorc was modified and then exported to Frisia. Both theories have their inherent weaknesses and a definitive answer likely awaits more archaeological evidence.

The early Futhorc was identical to the Elder Futhark but for the split of ᚨ a into three variants ᚪ āc, ᚫ æsc and ᚩ ōs, resulting in 26 runes. This was necessary to account for the new phoneme produced by the Ingvaeonic split of allophones of long and short a. The earliest ᚩ ōs rune is found on the 5th century Undley bracteate. ᚪ āc was introduced later, in the 6th century. The double-barred ᚻ hægl characteristic for continental inscriptions is first attested as late as 698, on St. Cuthbert's coffin; before that, the single-barred Scandinavian variant was used.

In England, the Futhorc was further extended to 28 and finally to 33 runes, and runic writing in England became closely associated with the Latin scriptoria from the time of Anglo-Saxon Christianization in the 7th century. The futhorc started to be replaced by the Latin alphabet from around the 9th century. In some cases, texts would be written in the Latin alphabet but runes would be used in place of the word it represented, and the þorn and wynn came to be used as extensions of the Latin alphabet. By the Norman Conquest of 1066 it was very rare and disappeared altogether shortly thereafter. From at least five centuries of use, less than 200 artifacts bearing futhorc inscriptions have survived.

[edit] Letters

The Futhorc

The Anglo-Saxon rune poem (Cotton Otho B.x.165) has the following runes, listed with their Unicode glyphs, their names, their transliteration and their approximate phonetic value in IPA notation where different from the transliteration:

ᚠ feoh "wealth" f [f], [v]
ᚢ ur "aurochs" u
þorn "thorn" þ, ð [θ], [ð]
ᚩ os "mouth" o
ᚱ rad "ride" r
ᚳ cen "torch" c [k]
ᚷ gyfu "gift" ȝ [g], [j]
ᚹ wynn "joy" w, ƿ [w]
ᚻ hægl "hail (precipitation)" h
ᚾ nyd "need, distress" n
ᛁ is "ice" i
ᛄ ger "year, harvest" j
ᛇ eoh "yew" eo
ᛈ peorð p
ᛉ eolh "elk-sedge" x
ᛋ sigel "Sun" s [s], [z]
ᛏ tir "Polaris" t
ᛒ beorc "birch" b
ᛖ eh "horse" e
ᛗ mann "man" m
ᛚ lagu "lake" l
ᛝ ing "Ing (a hero)" ŋ
ᛟ eðel "estate" œ
ᛞ dæg "day" d
ᚪ ac "oak" a
ᚫ æsc "ash-tree" æ
ᚣ yr y
ᛡ ior "eel" ia, io
ᛠ ear "grave" ea

The first 24 of these directly continue the Elder Futhark letters, extended by five additional runes, representing long vowels and diphthongs (á, æ, ý, ia, ea), comparable to the five forfeda of the Ogham alphabet.

Thorn and Wynn were introduced into the Latin English alphabet to represent [θ] and [w], but the they were replaced with th and w in Middle English.

The letter sequence, and indeed the letter inventory is not fixed. Compared to the letters of the rune poem given above,

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ œ d a æ y io ea

the Thames scramasax has 28 letters, with a slightly different order, and edhel missing:

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i io eo p x s t b e ŋ d l m j a æ y ea

The Vienna Codex has also 28 letters; the Ruthwell Cross inscription has 31 letters; Cotton Domitian A.ix has another four additional runes:

ᛢ cweorð kw, a modification of peorð
ᛣ calc "chalice" k (when doubled appearing as kk)
ᛥ stan "stone" st
ᚸ gar "spear" g (as opposed to palatalized ᚷ ȝ)

These four additional letters are not found epigraphically (the stan shape is found on the Westeremden yew-stick, but likely as a Spiegelrune). Cotton Domitian A.ix reaches thus a total of 33 letters, according to the transliteration introduced above arranged in the order

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ d œ a æ y ea io cw k st g

In the manuscript, the runes are arranged in three rows, glossed with Latin equivalents below (in the third row above) and with their names above (in the third row below). The manuscript has traces of corrections by a 16th century hand, inverting the position of m and d. Eolh is mistakenly labelled as sigel, and in place of sigel, there is a kaun like letter ᚴ, corrected to proper sigel ᛋ above it. Eoh is mis-labelled as eþel. Apart from ing and ear, all rune names are due to the later scribe, identified as Robert Talbot (died 1558).

feoh

þorn

rað

cen

gifu

wen

hegel

neað

inc

geu{a}r

sigel

peorð

ᛋ sig

ᚠ

ᚢ

ᚦ

ᚩ

ᚱ

ᚳ

ᚷ

ᚹ

ᚻ

ᚾ

ᛁ

ᛄ

ᛇ

ᛈ

ᛉ

ᚴ

tir

berc

eþel

deg

lagu

mann

ᛙ pro

ælc

ᛏ

ᛒ

ᛖ

ᛗ

ᛚ

ᛝ

ᛞ

ᛟ

ᚪ

ᚫ

ᚣ

ᛡ

m{d}

ing

ð{m}

ear

{orent.}
io

{cur.}
q

{iolx}
k

{z}
sc{st}

{&}
g

ᛠ

ᛢ

ᛣ

ᛥ

ᚸ

ᛘ

ior

cweorð

calc

stan

ear

Another futhorc row is found in Cotton Galba A.ii.

Walahfrid Strabo records a Futhorc row of 42 runes.

[edit] Inscription corpus

Futhorc series inscribed on a seax blade found in the Thames.

The Old English and Old Frisian Runic Inscriptions database project at the Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany aims at collecting the genuine corpus of Old English inscriptions containing more than two runes in its paper edition, while the electronic edition aims at including both genuine and doubtful inscriptions down to single-rune inscriptions. The corpus of the paper edition encompasses about one hundred objects (including stone slabs, stone crosses, bones, rings, brooches, weapons, urns, a writing tablet, tweezers, a sun-dial, comb, bracteates, caskets, a font, dishes, and graffiti). The database includes, in addition, 16 inscriptions containing a single rune, several runic coins, and 8 cases of dubious runic characters (runelike signs, possible Latin characters, weathered characters). Comprising less than 200 inscriptions, the corpus is slightly larger than that of Continental Elder Futhark (about 80 inscriptions, ca. 400–700), but slightly smaller than that of the Scandinavian Elder Futhark (about 260 inscriptions, ca. 200–800).

Runic finds in England cluster along the east coast with a few finds scattered further inland in Southern England. Frisian finds cluster in West Frisia. Looijenga (1997) lists 23 English (including two 7th c. Christian inscriptions) and 21 Frisian inscriptions predating the 9th century.

[edit] List of inscriptions

Frisian
- Ferwerd combcase, 6th c.; me uræ
- Amay comb, ca. 600; eda
- Oostyn comb, 8th c.; aib ka[m]bu / deda habuku (with a triple-barred h)
- Toornwerd comb, 8th c.; kabu
- Skanomody solidus, 575–610; skanomodu
- Harlingen solidus, 575–625, hada (two ac runes, double-barred h)
- Schweindorf solidus, 575–625, wela[n]du "Weyland" (or þeladu; running right to left)
- Folkestone tremissis, ca. 650; æniwulufu
- Midlum sceat, ca. 750; æpa
- Rasquert swordhandle (whalebone handle of a symbolic sword), late 8th c.; ekumæditoka, perhaps "I, Oka, not mad" (compare ek unwodz from the Danish corpus)
- Arum sword, a yew-wood miniature sword, late 8th c.; edæboda
- Westeremden A, a yew weaving-slay; adujislume[þ]jisuhidu
- Westeremden B, a yew-stick, 8th c.; oph?nmuji?adaamluþ / :wimœ?ahþu?? / iwio?u?du?ale
- Britsum yew-stick; þkniaberetdud / ]n:bsrsdnu; the k has Younger Futhark shape and probably represents a vowel.
- Hantum whalebone plate; [.]:aha:k[; the reverse side is inscribed with Roman ABA.
- Bernsterburen whalebone staff, ca. 800; tuda æwudu kius þu tuda
- Hamwick horse knucklebone, dated to between 650 and 1025; katæ (categorised as Frisian on linguistic grounds, from *kautōn "knucklebone")
- Wijnaldum B gold pendant, ca. 600; hiwi
- Bergakker gilt-silver scabbard mount, early 5th c., discovered in 1996; haþeþewas:ann:kesjam:logens:; the character transliterated as e is anomalous and otherwise unattested, looking like a doubled Latin V.
- Kantens combcase, early 5th c.; li
- Hoogebeintum comb, ca. 700; […]nlu / ded
- Wijnaldum A antler piece; zwfuwizw[…]

English
- Ash Gilton (Kent) gilt silver sword pommel, 6th c.; […]emsigimer[…]
- Chessel Down I (Isle of Wight), 6th c.; […]bwseeekkkaaa
- Chessel Down II (Isle of Wight) silver plate (attached to the scabbard mouthpiece of a ring-sword), early 6th c.; æko:?ori
- Boarley (Kent) copper disc-brooch, ca. 600; ærsil
- Harford (Norfolk) brooch, ca. 650; luda:gibœtæsigilæ "Luda repaired the brooch"
- West Heslerton (North Yorkshire) copper cruciform brooch, early 6th c.; neim
- Loveden Hill (Lincolnshire) urn; 5th to 6th c.; reading uncertain, maybe sïþæbæd þiuw hlaw "the grave of Siþæbæd the maid"
- Spong hill (Norfolk), three cremation urns, 5th c.; decorated with identical runic stamps, reading alu (in Spiegelrunen)
- Kent II coins (some 30 items), 7th century; reading pada
- Kent III, IV silver sceattas, ca. 600; reading æpa and epa
- Suffolk gold shillings (three items), ca. 660; stamped with desaiona
- Caistor-by-Norwich astragalus, 5th c.; possibly a Scandinavian import, in Elder Futhark transliteration reading raïhan "roe"
- Watchfield (Oxfordshire) copper fittings, 6th c.; Elder Futhark reading hariboki:wusa (with a probably already fronted to æ)
- Wakerley (Northamptonshire) copper brooch, 6th c.; buhui
- Dover (Kent) brooch, ca. 600; þd bli / bkk
- Upper Thames Valley gold coins (four items), 620s; benu:tigoii; benu:+:tidi
- Willoughby-on-the-Wolds (Nottinghamshire) copper bowl, ca. 600; a
- Cleatham (South Humbershire) copper bowl, ca. 600; […]edih
- Sandwich/Richborough (Kent) stone, 650 or earlier; […]ahabu[…]i, perhaps *ræhæbul "stag"
- Whitby I (Yorkshire) jet spindle whorl; ueu
- Selsey (West Sussex) gold plates, 6th to 8th c.; brnrn / anmu
- St. Cuthbert's coffin (Durham), dated to 698
- Whitby II (Yorkshire) bone comb, 7th c.; [dæ]us mæus godaluwalu dohelipæ cy[ i.e. deus meus, god aluwaldo, helpæ Cy… "my god, almighty god, help Cy…" (Cynewulf or a similar personal name; compare also names of God in Old English poetry.)
- the Franks casket; 7th c.
- the Thames scramasax; 9th c.
- the Ruthwell Cross; 8th c., the inscription may be partly a modern forgery
- the Brandon antler piece, wohs wildum deoræ an "[this] grew on a wild animal"; 9th century.^[1]

Futhorc related manuscript texts:

Codex Vindobonensis 795 (9th c.)
the Anglo-Saxon rune poem (Cotton Otho B.x.165)
Solomon and Saturn (Cotton Vitellius A.xv)

[edit] Notes

^ Bammesberger, Alfred. "The Brandon Antler Runic Inscription." Neophilologus 86 (2002), 129–31. [1]

[edit] References

A. Bammesberger (ed.), Old English Runes and their Continental Background, Anglistische Forschungen 217, Heidelberg (1991).
A. Bammesberger, 'Das Futhark und seine Weiterentwicklung in der anglo-friesischen Überlieferung', in Bammesberger and Waxenberger (eds.), Das fuþark und seine einzelsprachlichen Weiterentwicklungen, Walter de Gruyter (2006), ISBN 3-11-019008-7, 171–187.
J. H. Looijenga, Runes around the North Sea and on the Continent AD 150–700, dissertation, Groningen University (1997).
Odenstedt, Bengt, On the Origin and Early History of the Runic Script, Uppsala (1990), ISBN 9185352209; chapter 20: 'The position of continental and Anglo-Frisian runic forms in the history of the older futhark '
R. I. Page (1999). An Introduction to English Runes. The Boydell Press, Woodbridge. ISBN 0-85115-768-8.
Orrin W. Robinson (1992). Old English and its Closest Relatives: A Survey of the Earliest Germanic Languages. Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1454-1.
Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45 (1996).
H. Marquardt, Die Runeninschriften der Britischen Inseln (Bibliographie der Runeninschriften nach Fundorten, Bd. I), Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Klasse, dritte Folge, Nr. 48, Göttingen 1961, pp.10-16.