User talk:Andrewspencer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Have re-edited the article and placed sources of information regarding each of the claims made in the article. Edit some of the bias towards Dzogchen out.
Contents |
[edit] cluetrain
Would you like to help me clean up The Cluetrain Manifesto? I merged the website page the cluetrain manifesto with the concept page cluetrain into a new book page The Cluetrain Manifesto. I've read the website (a couple of years ago), but not the book. Uncle Ed 14:36, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Cluetrain Help
Yes would be good to get some help here. I have been involved in other pages and have not noticed what has been happening here. Thanks. --andyman 09:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] NetSuite
Hi, can you please comment on the NetSuite talk page. User:Sleepnoremore is stating incorrectly that I have added the section about 24SevenOffice. --Sleepyhead81 15:08, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sockpuppets
Sleepyhead, please do not enlist the help of sockpuppets on this issue. This only shows that you did in fact enlist other's help to market your product on Wikipedia in the first place. - Sleepnomore 16:17, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] NetSuite
This article still has NPOV issues. "The very way in which NetSuite pulls everything together for your business into the one platform could be seen to be a high risk -- what if the platform goes down, is attacked, or the company running the services is bankrupted?" is one of the most blatant examples. It needs a bunch of work. Reading the article more closely, it seems to be attacking NetSuite more than advertising for them. I know that you have battled over this article in the past and removed an {{NPOV}} tag before, but I am putting one back in. NPOV doesn't mean including strong opinions for and strong opinions against, it means providing neutral information. —WAvegetarian•CONTRIBUTIONSTALK• EMAIL• 10:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] VisionGateway, Inc.
A tag has been placed on VisionGateway, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 04:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
