User talk:Andjam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives:

• User talk:Andjam/Archive1 - main talk
• User talk:Andjam/Archive2 - more talk prior to my move to Massachusetts
• User talk:Andjam/Speedy1 - I read all user talk messages, but especially enjoy the vicious ones and refractor them to a page of their own.

Contents 1 Discussion of articles in talk page 2 hanson-young 3 Cape Cod RTA articles 4 The honor is mine 5 Advertising by Westpac 6 Australia at the Winter Olympics 7 Re: Your tag on Hilaly 8 Deletion of Disputes and dialogue involving CAIR

[edit] Discussion of articles in talk page

What article do you mean? I always used the article's talk page to discuss articles. Lord Metroid 10:54, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] hanson-young

Right, I'm adding references that can be used later to weave into the article. Since the article is on the chopping block right now, I'm rather more concerned with establishing notability rather than getting every sentence in suitable order. — coelacan talk — 01:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cape Cod RTA articles

I don't see any objectionable advertising (any advertising at all, actually!) on the Web sites you delinked. FCYTravis 01:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The honor is mine

My pleasure. I'm semi-active at the site, to keep opinion from being stated as fact, but it will inevitably be criticized. Happy editing! --Hojimachong^talk 03:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Advertising by Westpac

Hi Andjam. I have to say I am gobsmacked by your implication that I have somehow singled out for deletion an article you created because I have disagreed with you at the Andrew Bolt page. Looking back at the history, we had a brief, but perfectly civil exchange last September and we ironed out the issue you raised. As I explained at the talk page for the AfD, I had no idea the article was yours, and it wouldn't have mattered a bit either way. I have had stronger disagreements with another user at the Bolt page, but I'm no more interested in "targeting" his articles or edits than I am in seeking out yours for any acts of vindictiveness. I simply shake my head at your suggestion. Have a wonderful day. MrMonroe 04:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Australia at the Winter Olympics

Great article. Thanks. Keep up the good work. :-) Steve Dufour 02:36, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Your tag on Hilaly

Taj El-Din Hilaly's still as POV as it was when there were brief discussions concerning the issue on the article's talk-page. I presume you're at least partly in agreement that it's not NPOV, and that you're simply asking for my input.

I'm going to archive the current talk-page and start anew with this issue. I doubt there are many editors watching the page, but trying a systematic approach to balancing the article out couldn't hurt. Don't wait on my action, though. I'll probably take some time, being occupied or lazy. -- Shoejar^talk/edits 05:58, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of Disputes and dialogue involving CAIR

I've merged the content of Disputes and dialogue involving CAIR into CAIR (Disputes and dialogue section) and tagged the former for deletion. -- Shoejar^talk/edits 00:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)