Talk:And One
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Unofficial Biography?
(from www.andone.co.uk)
Is this clear of copyvio? RJFJR 02:30, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Unofficial Biography?
Where did you see it on the andone.co.uk site? I just copied it over from the And one (band) article that was even older than this one. Corby
[edit] too cluttered??
do you think maybe we should go ahead and do a seperate album article for each album so there's not so much clutter and white space on the page?
[edit] Re: too cluttered??
I think that would be awesome. Especially if we get the proper Album information box stuff on the right. What's the template for that? Corby
[edit] And One Albums
Ok, I went ahead and made an album article for Agressor. Submitted for review. I suggest that once we get one of these made up for each album, we go ahead and redo the page so that there's not so much clutter and white space. Do a copy and paste under "edit this page" and change information as needed. Oh, I'm not sure if this is a requirement, but I noticed that the template I used had the album art listed at 170 pixels squared.
[edit] Re: And One Albums
Finished everything. Changes? Sectryan 19:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Great job! One thing I don't get though is why the album title is written "9.9.99 9uhr" instead of "9.9.99 9 Uhr"? It was written that way on the original page before I re-did the discography and all that, and I looked at how it was written on my copy of the CD and assumed it was a typo. Why is "Uhr" joined and lower-case? - Corby 04:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: And One Albums
We can always move the page. That way it'll redirect no matter which way it's spelled. Sectryan 06:20, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] AND 1
I added a disambig link to And 1. I just saw in the history that someone took it out, but it seems like a pretty relevant redirect (they're pronounced the same, but spelled differently). Any objection to this? Garrepi 17:16, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: AND 1
No objections here. I agree & I'm surprised I didn't make that change earlier. Sectryan 17:44, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] YouTube links
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 05:16, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
