Talk:Alphabet City, Manhattan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	NYC Portal This article is part of WikiProject New York City, an effort to create, expand, and improve New York City-related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Removal Of Opinion 2 Avenue Q 3 Research and Opinions 4 The Title Of The Page 5 Avenue A 6 Neutrality Tag

[edit] Removal Of Opinion

Did I spell that right? Anyway, the fact that the yuppies are taking over, is yes, a negative thing in most people opinions, but not everyones, right? I mean, I think it's a negative thing, but it's still an opinion isn't it?

Anyway, I removed the "On The Plus Side" and replaced it with "Recently" because new buisness and apartments are NOT neccasarily a good thing. Cyprus 28 June 2005 13:56 (UTC)

No. Yuppies are pure evil. --Tothebarricades 01:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Avenue Q

Avenue Q is a parody of Avenues A, B, C, and D? I thought it referred to Avenue Q in Brooklyn. -- Sheepshead Bay —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.113.104.47 (talk • contribs) 13:56, 13 November 2005.

most people I know thought it referred to the real avenue Q (or Quentin Rd, but people still refer to it as Ave Q), too. The wikipedia page on the musical mentions this ave, plus the alphabet city possibility, but says that the authors have stated that it doesn't refer specifically to either of these. I'm going to delete the reference to Avenue Q the musical, unless someone else presents some kind of evidence that it's really referring to Alphabet city. Mahern 05:50, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

What about the line "I started at Avenue A..." I forget the exact wording, but the jist of it was, he couldn't afford anything he saw until he hit Q. Kuronue 01:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Research and Opinions

Not sure about that. Anyone want to do some research to see if the man who did Supersize Me actually lives here? I was under the impression that he lives in Soho or the LES. Then again, depends on your definition of names and borders. Cyprus 00:59, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] The Title Of The Page

Alphabet city was a term developers coined to make the neighbourhood more popular during gentrification.. It sounds better to potential buyers then "Loisida". Maybe this should be changed somehow? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RatherBeBiking (talk • contribs) 20:30, 9 January 2006.

[edit] Avenue A

I've noticed that "Avenue A", "Avenue B", etc. all redirect here, but there is a stub article about Avenue A at Avenue A (Manhattan). Should this be merged? Should "Avenue A" be changed to redirect to that stub? --Larry V (talk | contribs) 12:57, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes - I'll do a redirect. --DavidShankBone 16:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neutrality Tag

Just so that people don't hyperventilate I'll attempt to explain some of the reasons-a few of them alluded to in aforementioned comments-behind the neutrality/factual tag.

Primarily, the overall tone of the article, which is suffused with subjectivity and bias.

The implicit-and sometimes explicit-assumption that gentrification is necessarily bad. Or conversely, that the "culture" of a more crime-ridden, chaotic neighborhood was preferable.

Also, I have a bit of a problem with the way the Tompkins Square Riot is described. Ruthfulbarbarity 21:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Ruth, I am going to take down the neutrality tag because you don't actually highlight what you find objectionable - these reasons are too vague and require another editor to pore over the article trying to guess what you find objectionable. You don't give any issues that a person can actually address. You should give examples from the article, instead of leaving it for us to figure out what--or where--you take issue with the tone. Once you give examples from the article, we can discuss with the POV tag up. Please see Wikipedia:When people complain rather than edit. --DavidShankBone 16:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair enough.

One major objection-among many-would be this section,

Recent history and gentrification

The drawback to redevelopment has been that many families, artists and small businesses can no longer afford to remain in the neighborhood. Young urban professionals or "yuppies" now dominate the area around Avenues A and B. Avenue C is still a transitional area, but rents are rising quickly and many long-time residents and businesses are being priced out of the market.

Avenue D, home to a number of large low-income housing projects, seems destined to remain affordable for the foreseeable future, although plans have been floated in city hall which call for the eventual destruction of the housing projects and redevelopment of the waterfront along East River Park. As part of the gentrification, the area lost a number of community gardens, which were planted by residents in vacant lots. These gardens serve as valuable green space in the densely built neighborhood. A recent major loss has been the Charas community center.

The first part is subjective-a recurring theme in this article-while the second is speculative and extremely tendentious. Why are community gardens more valuable than new businesses? Even if they are, do you think that's a ineference that a purportedly unbiased, encylcopedic article should draw? Ruthfulbarbarity 01:10, 21 October 2006 (UTC)