User talk:Alkalada

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Alkalada! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- LittleOldMe 11:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

[edit] Civility

While I have a certain feeling that we have met before and that you already know it, I have to warn you that edit summaries like this are highly inappropriate and that civility is not negotiable on Wikipedia. Please show respect for the fellow editors even when you disagree with them. Thanks. Duja 09:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Hahahihihoho, you do have a point about official names, but your manners haven't changed much. Being right doesn't entitle you to scream at other editors; guess I could block you right away for continued edit warring, tho' I'll give you some leeway this time. Duja 14:25, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I havent attacked anybody accept when I called estavistis behaviour as cetnik behaviou but I am sorry for that, it will not happen anymore.

I will bee cool in the future when editing. And show sources because I am only editing in articles where I know for 100 % it is true.

Alkalada 14:27, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cool? No, evading your ban is not cool. Account blocked.

You are not allowed to evade your ban, Hahahihihoho. By creating these obvious sockpuppets, you are only making it more and more impossible to appeal your ban. I suggest you stop evading your ban for a month and then appeal to the arbcom (see Wikipedia:Arbitration committee) to be allowed to start editing again. By e-mail, not by creating yet another sock. If you get permission, nobody will block you. If you ever grasp the principle that the test for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, NOT TRUTH, that is. Why is that so hard?

I have blocked the obvious sock Alkalada. Don't create another one. Bishonen | talk 21:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC).

Okej. Well it has gone a week now.

So, in three weeks time, I am going to tell that guys that I have been banned in one month and followed your advice to tell them that. Alkalada 11:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Upon your request and Bishonen's agreement, I have unblocked you. Please feel free to drop me a note if you run into trouble. Fred Bauder 00:57, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I have blocked you for a week. Please take a look at your edits and consider how you might be more courteous and less confrontive. Fred Bauder 16:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, my suggestion would be to put sources and reason for editing on the talk page before editing. And I just cant accept people write that Bosnia never was a modern state. Because it was a modern state before 1500. And if that is nor considered to be modern, then Slovenia and Croatia also never was modern states. And this is really unfair if you dont block Ivan. Alkalada 16:12, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

For now I'm trying to get you unblocked, not expand the matter to include other users. You have it in your power to modify your behavior enough that no reasonable person would block you. For starters, just don't revert. And certainly, if after discussion a revert seems justified don't add comments like "revert vandal". Regarding Bosnia as a modern state, I don't know about 1500, but it did issue stamps as a dependency of Austro-Hungary. I think by modern state the 19th or 20th century is being referred to and I doubt an independent Bosnia existed in that time frame. But it isn't the question of whether Bosnia was a modern state, but going ballistic over the question. That is what must change, and it must change with you. Fred Bauder 20:45, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, if Bosnia wasnt modern staten in 18th and 19th, then Croatia and Slovenia also wasnt and that must be added which that croat doesnt. And regarding Bosnia, they joined Austria Hungary in 1878!!

They was independent between 1200 and 1400. Alkalada 11:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Okey, what date is it today? Alkalada 12:36, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

It is time Fred Bauder 16:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

What do you mean? Hehe, I just wondered cause I will be unbanned today. Alkalada 10:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, now it has gone a week? Why am I not unbanned? Alkalada 15:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FBiH/ RS Flags

Hey, nice work with the quick update regarding the entity flag decision. I congratulate you, you were quicker then me. Thanks, Vseferović 02:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, actually... RS flag is constitutional but the RS coat of arms and anthem and holidays is not. Alkalada 11:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] To Alkalada

I think this has gone on long enough. We need to establish a few facts: Yugoslavia existed, and it suited many people, and for much of the time, it has the full support from many Bosnians who formed a part of the administration. Secondly, "born in Bosnia makes you Bosnian", or what grounds? You still fail to produce this simple answer. A Bosnian national or a Bosnian citizen? If it is citizenship you mean, he doesn't have to be born there, he can acquire it in different ways, just as people born outside of a country can take that country's citizenship. If it is ethnicity/nationality, then that is to do with his private decision. As for your land being Bosnia & Herzegovina, well, it was from 1992, and as you say, once before for three centuries, but this may give rise to a group of local individuals like you who claim territorial integrity over that region, and congratulations, as today you have it; however, no land belongs to no nation. There is no such claim that Strasbourg rightfully belongs to Germany, or that it rightfully belongs to France. There are disputed territories all over the globe, and you have a responsibility at Wikipedia to present facts, not opinions, and moreover, be fair and neutral, not claiming that "Bosnia is Bosnian; Serbs and Croats were aggressors who tried to take it; Yugoslavia was a made-up false communist regime; you're born in Bosnia, you're Bosnian, as though it is encoded in the genes of everyone mysteriously conceived there". You have the right to call someone Bosnian only when 1)you can prove they have Bosnian citizenship, or 2)the individual has revealed that he/she is proud to be Bosnian, or declares Bosnian/Bosniak/Muslim ethnicity; at no other time do you arrogate that anyone is anything at all. It is known that Prelog was Croatian, apart from that, I don't go around implementing ethnicities on individuals and subjects. It seems that we can produce a million pieces of documentation to prove this, but it cuts no ice with you because you have your own ideas as to what makes his Bosnian. I cannot change your thoughts, but the rest of the community doesn't share them, so please, from here on, keep them to yourself. Once again I stress, this is no attack on Bosnia & Herzegovina. Evlekis 23:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Well, obviously it is a attack cause you claim that only bosniak is bosnian. My personal opinion is that you talk bullshit and we will continue talking on the talk pages.

Btw... in Yugoslavia we bosniaks had no power and they threatened us like we were jews. Alkalada 08:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Long live, the nation of Bosnia Herzegovina! Barbaric 01:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

I just heard that Kosovo are going to get independence, now the last thing in the so called Greater Serbia is dissolved and you have won your freedom.

You can say Serbia is like Nokia, it is getting smaller and smaller. Alkalada 21:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Right on! Kosova is Albanian! I am sure with our 95% ethnical majoriry, we will get the refferendum. I worry a little that if we dont, I might have to learn to speak Serbian. dont want that. But then if i can speak serbian, i can communicate with my good Bosnian friends in their language! Long live the new European union! Bosnia, Kosova and Albania! Fuck the rest Barbaric 20:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

in your dreams boy. Jordovan 15:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Some advice

Please calm down a little bit and consider others' viewpoint a bit. If a person is born of Croatian parents in Sarajevo while they are temporarily there, then they move back to Croatia. If the person spends their life speaking Croatian, and things of himself as a Croatian, they they are probably best considered a Croatian, despite the accident of birth. Fred Bauder 14:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I have calmed down! I have expressed myself on the talkpages everywere and I am calm. And Vladimir Prelog wasnt Croatian. If they want I will write he was a Bosnian/Croatian writer but never Croatian. Alkalada 12:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I am not Emir Arven!

Check my IP and everything and you will see! Alkalada 08:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

I believe you. KingIvan 03:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC) 08:53, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Join MSN! Alkalada 11:38, 12 March 2007 (UTC)