Talk:Aleksei Losev

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't think the article is big enough to be divided to major sections. --Barbatus 22:44, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bibliography

If I'm not mistaken, most of recently added to the list works of Losev's are published in Russian. Do they belong here? Barbatus 14:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Of course they do -- I added Losev's most important works (accoprding to reference work in my native language). Originals have usually been added in similar Wikipedia articles. Constanz - Talk 15:24, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

I disagree: his most important works could be (and have been) mentioned in the article, but for the list of publications available (hence ISBN/ISSN numbers) for an English reader they are not useful at all. Barbatus 17:05, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

... Oh, by the way: is Russian your native language? Really? Barbatus 17:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

No, I'm Estonian. These titles are some oh Losev's major works, thus they should be mentioned.--Constanz - Talk 05:50, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Mentioned, yes. But do they belong to the Bibliography, that is, in our case, a list of published works available to a reader? Besides, there's a link to the Russian Wiki article on Losev, where one can find list of his works in Losev's native language, if one's interested. --Barbatus 13:51, 12 April 2006 (UTC)