User talk:Ajuk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

This is just a notice that I've nominated {{templates}}, which you created, for deletion.I've also included a welcome message for you below. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 20:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, Ajuk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 


Contents

[edit] Chyclist

A tag has been placed on Chyclist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Wodup 07:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mustang, Texas

OK, it is time for your joking to end. You are potentially offending people, both here in the Wikipedia community and the wider readership. What you are doing could be seen as vandalism or disruption and you could get blocked from editing Wikipedia for it. You might not get another warning before having a block imposed, so be careful and be serious from now on.

Wodup 07:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Ur edit

As NPWatcher is not configured to do that, no. But, thanks for bringing that to my attention. Maybe we can implement that in a future version. —Pilotguy (ptt) 19:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Vandlised

Template:Vandlised has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Renesis (talk) 00:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good Jokes

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Good Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. If you plan to add more material to the article, I advise you to do so immediately. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orderinchaos78 01:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)


For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Graffiti

Dear participant of Wikipedia: WikiProject Graffiti, your assistance is needed and input required at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Graffiti. The project has become inactive and unfocused and I'm calling meeting to address these issues, and find a resolution. There is work to be done, and we are the ones to do it. Regards, Dfrg.msc 01:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Bad license

You'll need to re-upload the image with a more appropriate license, then. We can't accept images that are licensed only for use on Wikipedia. --Coredesat 21:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

So why is that an option then? Ajuk 16:24, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Because people get permission to use images on Wikipedia believing that they can be used. If there was no option, then people would upload the image with a different licence and images with such permission would be difficult to locate as it might not be mentioned and/or the image is tagged with the incorrect licence. Once uploaded, the description page states that such images are not permitted and warn the uploader that it will soon be deleted. The admin who comes along to delete the image will likely re-tag the image with an appropriate tag if it can be kept. mattbr 17:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Redscale1.jpg

Dear Ajuk, I have nominated Image:Redscale1.jpg for speedy deletion as the source says that the image is licensed for non-commercial use only. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

On the description page, you mentioned you have been in contact with the creator of the image. Please ask the creator to release the image under a compatible licence ({{cc-by-2.0}} would be OK), which will then be permissible for Wikipedia, and please consider uploading the image to Wikimedia Commons, which allows the image to be used on any Wikimedia project including the English Wikipedia. Please ask if you have any questions. Thanks, mattbr 14:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

You cannot claim {{GFDL-self}} as you are not the creator of the work. The licence on Flickr is still a non-commercial licence and still cannot be used on Wikipedia, so I have re-tagged the image. mattbr 17:29, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your vandalism of Ken Rockwell

Thanks for your contribution to Ken Rockwell, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the Sandbox to get started. Thank you. Rhobite 00:55, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The above message should also apply to Church of Modern Day Firefox Users, which I have deleted. If you continue to add jokes to Wikipedia you could lose your editing privileges. Rhobite 00:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Cokinxxx.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cokinxxx.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Rhobite 01:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/j/u/User_talk%7EAjuk_1e3f.html"