Talk:Age of Empires III campaign storyline

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Famicom style controller This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale.

Knight chess piece. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Strategy games, an effort by several users to improve Wikipedia articles on strategy games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of Low priority within strategy games for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

This article is within the scope of the Age of Empires WikiProject, an effort to improve articles on the video games and expansions of these which compose the series.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating on the assessment scale.

[edit] Fact or fiction?

Is this fact or fiction? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.70.209.164 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 11 July 2006.

If you mean if this fact is correct with the game, yes. If you mean if this is historical happenings, there are some included, but the story is fictional. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.211.190.247 (talk • contribs) 06:13, 11 August 2006.

Should it not be mentioned that this is a break from the games previous form of campaign, where it offers multiple chapters and timings, and that this is completely fictional, whereas before it was based on fact. Also, I think i remeber an interview with on of the designers, who said that they put people on the other side of the conflict (with the saracens during the crusade), whereas in this game you play as the prevailing faction. Im not sure if anything can be made of this, but i think it should be mentioned. --Chickenfeed9 21:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)