User talk:Aecis/Messages 181-192
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| User:Aecis' archived messages | |
|---|---|
| Messages 1-12 | Messages 13-24 | Messages 25-36 | Messages 37-48 | Messages 49-60 | Messages 61-72 | Messages 73-84 | Messages 85-96 | Messages 97-108 | Messages 109-120 | Messages 121-132 | Messages 133-144 | Messages 145-156 | Messages 157-168 | Messages 169-180 | Messages 181-192 | Messages 193-204 | Messages 205-216 | Messages 217-228 | Messages 229-240 | Messages 241-252 | Messages 253-264 | Messages 265-276 | |
[edit] revert warring on Fenerbahçe S.K.
Hi Aecis, can you check history of Fenerbahçe S.K.. It's really difficult to handle. At least i can understad User:Profesor is using socks to revert warring. Other user is User:Scragnoth, but he seems to be just reverting. They have written a few things on talk page. But then a few new users has started to reverting just like Profesor, using similar edit summaries. I guess that, all reverters which are using "VANDALISM REVERT", "Vandalism", "Revert", are socks of Profesor. You can check difs and users also their logs, cause they are new users:) Btw, i'm a sysop on tr:wiki for more than 1 year. I know functions, etc:) Cheers --Ugur Basak 23:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Wrong alert, this is another sockpuppeter not related with Burak18:) Profesor is adding "Eder..." other one is removing. --Ugur Basak 00:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia
Hi, hope you don't mind me overriding your deleteprotection - I thought it would be the easiest way to end all this silliness if I just rewrote the stupid thing myself. Perhaps we can now just close the DR? I mean, as far as I can see there were no real substantial arguments against the existence of a stub article as such, were there? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Muslim Guild POV-pushers trying to get original article deleted to protect their POV Fork
Striver's POV-pushing cohort User:Burgas00 has, in a fit of his POV-pushing zeal, nominated Beit_Hanoun_November_2006_incident for deletion here. The cowardly bad faith POV-pusher wouldn't even sign his own name to the deletion request either. I thought you should be warned of this. RunedChozo 22:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] racist
trying to whitewash the terrorists, fine, bring it on, ass-bitch. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.7.35.126 (talk • contribs).
ha ha, little racist protector can't deal with being called on his lies, what a surprise, same old racist bullshit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.7.35.126 (talk • contribs).
[edit] Edits
Many thanks again for your help with my article I created on the Wild Beasts, I now understand wikipedia music guidlines and feel that they do not merit inclusion! I was wondering if you could have a quick look over my edits and let me know if you think I'm going about things in the right way? I'm a new user and I've only created one more page on Burneside but have done a few edits to other pages and I'm getting into anti vandilism edits. Don't worry, I'm not planning to apply for adminship any time soon, I would just appreciate your comments. Many thanks in advance Ryanpostlethwaite 21:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] lalate (moved from archive)
I would like to you please undelete the lalate page.
On 11/26/06, lalate revised its page to make it conformance for Wikipedia's policy for corporate postings. The result of the posting was NO warning that it was in non conformance. Yet thereafter it was deleted.
a) It is not spam. It is a corporate listing of a company. The mere listing of a corporation page is not grounds for deletion under Wikipedia's policy since in the context of the page is not used for advertising purposes.
b) The page had no warning against it. This subsequent revision that was in conformance with Wikipedia had no warning against it for deletion but was thereafter deleted by you.
c) The page is similar to the page for CLUBPLANET, both in tone and categories. If one page is permitted another page cannot be non permitted.
Kindly undelete the lalate page or indicate what lines you felt were not in conformance.
Thank you
lalate
Thank you for comments.
We will correct our article and repost it per your instructions. In the meantime, kindly delete the page Clubplanet since it does not conform to exactly what you have deleted lalate for - Clubplanet's page lacks any assertion of notability by verifiable, lacks any reliable third party sources, and is merely a listing of links to its website.
---
Thank you for your assistance regarding guidelines.
Thank you also for your assistance regarding the clubplanet page The author of the clubplanet page here is an is an employee of clubplanet writing about his company.
[edit] User:Alexdr101 did it again
Hi, I am not familiar in detail with the vandal fighting policies of English Wiki (e.g., I neither know them, nor have any time right now to figure them out). I just want to say that User:Alexdr101 keeps vandalising wikipages after your two warnings. Just reverted nonsense additions by him to Guillaume Amontons. Time to block or alert admins? Sincerely, Alexei Kouprianov 10:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion Review:
Aecis, stop being a POV-pushing user, and just accept briefsism exists. It's as encyclopedic as Happy Feet is for god's sake!! Do we have to take this to WP:ANI or ArbCom?? Just stop pushing your POV, Aecis!! --Gassbiggs 22:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 72.183.125.111
See [1] and Talk:Alexander Litvinenko. This is the same editor who was adding the British Airways bit to the top of the article. He has also removed a section on suicide dismissing it as speculation. It is speculation, but it is a theory that has been discussed frequently during this whole situation. He also got involved regarding a Po-210 issue here. He's basically saying he wants to preserve the article's content accuracy, and he has been removing major sections and making claims without even discussing on the talk page. What do you think should be done? And...do you think I'm overreacting a bit? Nishkid64 22:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Oh nvm, I didn't see you reverted the edit. I left a message on the user's talk page. I'll see how things progress from there. Nishkid64 23:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] re: Deletion Review of Briefism
Ah... I misread the page-history. Shouldn't try to work when I'm tired. Thank you for the correction.
Nevertheless, I do not see evidence that this is worse trolling than we normally have to deal with on the page. You said that this has been discussed repeatedly. I don't remember the topic coming up on DRV and could not find it when I searched through all the "Recently Concluded" pages. The closest I could come was the Third briefs discussion which was logged only once and doesn't seem to be the same topic anyway. If this has been previously discussed, please provide a link or two.
A review of the pagehistory and whatlinkshere show a couple of speedy-deletions and three(?) AFDs but I don't yet see evidence that would justify disrupting the procedures at DRV. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I do remember the Adolph Hitler fiasco. The connection to those other debates was not obvious to me. Rossami (talk) 23:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Deletion of Charles Page High School Band
Please move the discussion of the previous page of Charles Page High School band to User talk:M79 specialist/Charles Page High School Marching Band. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by M79 specialist (talk • contribs) 01:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Pls undelete PERKEPIS
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PERKEPIS. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Perkepis is an interschool and a recognised association nationally in Malaysia. One asks; "why delete PERKEPIS, but not pages about schools?". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Syed niz89 (talk • contribs).
