Talk:Adventist Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Adventist Review is part of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church and Seventh-day Adventist Church-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as high-importance on the importance scale.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church To-do: edit Expand "Glacier View Controversy" section, to include more background, history, theological issues, and details of the Glacier View meeting itself Add to "Adventist Responses to Criticisms" section, ideally with material from Adventist scholars etc.

[edit] Title

Isn't the correct title "Adventist Review", without the article ("The")? That was the original title for this article, but the author decided to move it here. By the way, if anyone wants to move a page, please use the Wikipedia move operation, rather than just cutting and pasting and hence losing the page history. --Colin MacLaurin 06:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

I have the latest copy in front of me, and the name is clearly "Adventist Review". Many times the title "Adventist Review" appears without the article ("the"), and one blurb on page 2 starts, "The Adventist Review...", clearly showing that the article is not included in the title. Hence I will move the page. --Colin MacLaurin 06:43, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree with the move. Not sure how to go about it though. May have to be done through request moves in order to keep both contribution histories. It seems to be an uncontroversial move. I will try to move it, however, on failing that, RM should be the place to go. Ansell 08:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm in favour of this action. MyNam e IsNotBob 09:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Aah (light bulb moment)! Just noticed that a historic title was "The Adventist Review", until a change, and then a later revert to "Adventist Review" but without the article. This might explain the confusion. Colin MacLaurin 09:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More naming issues

Going to the original archives, as I have listed the links for on the page, yield different titles used throughout the history of the magazine. It is better to go to the source than rely on William Johnsson's article Our Roots and Mission. Some of the names used are, from my random sample of the originals: