The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit ยท refresh)
Definitely a B-class. Properly referenced from paper resources and well-written. Actually meets most GA requirements - being well-written and well-structured with a good lead (although need to follow WP:MOS on headings - there's too many primary headings with one paragraph each!), being factually accurate and verifiable (but needs inline citations), is broad in its coverage, is neutral, stable and its only image is properly tagged, I would suggest more detailed sourcing/citations and then go for WP:GAC DanielT5 18:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)