Talk:Active record pattern

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

I don't think LINQ is an implementation of Active Record. It seems to just add a veneer on top of sql statements, rather than creating an maintaining a whole object.

It definitely is not. Besides, it was just thrown in for no reason. I'm removing it. --AndreFillipe 11:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

What about Enterprise Java Beans - don't they fit the bill?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/c/t/Talk%7EActive_record_pattern_5531.html"