Talk:Absolute convergence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Why is products of series here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.7.250.116 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

It's not absolutely, logically necessary, but it demonstrates an important application of absolute convergence. Melchoir 14:54, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Another user

The use of the word "theorem" in the (nice) discussion that starts: ". . . this theorem can be imagined as. . ." is confusing. There is a theorem that absolute convergence implies convergence: Is that meant here? This implies the too-loose-to-be-a-theorem vebiage about "rearrangements...intuitive." But the reader has not yet met the theorem, so it is premature to call it such here.

I generally like giving intuitive grounding for math, and I think this section does a good job of doing so. I can't think of good substitute for "theorem". Might be necessary to add more words.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/b/s/Talk%7EAbsolute_convergence_b967.html"