User talk:Abronkeeler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] 
Welcome, Abronkeeler!
Hello, Abronkeeler, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- Image:Crystal 128 ksmiletris.png The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Fun stuff...
{{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!➨ ЯEDVERS 14:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Help needed
Hi Abronkeeler, in your comment on Townsend, you refered to its past edits. I have tried to find editors who might be in favor of keeping it to bring them in for a decision, but am having a bad time since most past editors were not logged in. You may have noticed that the discussion page is getting long and full of biased statements. Can you help me bring any editors in favor of keeping to the discussion. It is obvious that if we let it there, the article will suffer from deletions and reverts, uncivil discussions etc. Please, let me know your opinion about the current situation. I would appreciate any help. Hoverfish 09:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] On Meher Baba edits
Maybe you do love Wikipedia, but you know sweet all about Baba it seems. I reverted your vandalism. Its referenced now too, and if you are into references, as you imply, you will notice that the article in question has no proper Refences Page. So it makes no sense to say my stuff had no references. if you had been reading the discussion you would have noticed its a work in progress. So lover boy why dont you add something positive and start a proper reference page, try the Harvard system. --Liam7 04:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks for cleanup
Special thanks for removing that Avatar Center link. I just saw its contents! Hoverfish Talk 23:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you Hoverfish. I think Nemonoman may be right about the other site I removed, however. "Shehariarji" it seems may in fact be an alt version of the spelling. And his point of it being non-partisan is good too. The other did not fit at all as you saw. Abronkeeler 13:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
