User talk:A4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Welcome
Hello, A4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
If you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to anounce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.
Finally, in case you are interested, similar boards exist at Russia portal as many editors contribute to topics related to both countries. The respective boards there are: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. Of course there are also many other portals at Wikipedia or you may just get right into editing.
Again, welcome! --Kuban Cossack 10:59, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
-- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 23:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
-->
[edit] Adding POV categories to Holodomor
Hi. Please don't simply re-add the POV category to the Holodomor article. There is a lengthy discussion on the article's talk page about this topic and why the category does not belong. If you disagree with the consensus, please discuss there. Thank you. TheQuandry 19:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I see there is no consensus in the talk page. On the contrary - the denial of Genocide is a POV.
- I have argued my position and it is not a POV. --A4 20:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Personal attacks and POV edits
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Holodomor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. TheQuandry 20:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Тут, як завжди цілий інтернаціонал зібрався. Ось, людина, яка розміщує у себе шаблон, що він фанат Кагановича, вже погрожує блокуванням. Напиши йому у відповідь на сторінку, щоб не погрожував тобі, що його дії підпадають під порушення правил про недопущення погроз, і т.д. і т.п. А краще витри цю херню, як звичайну персональну атаку. --Yakudza 21:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- This is not a threat, mr. Yakudza, but an official en wiki boilerplate vandalism warning. And pushing a POV against an obvious consensus sure counts as one. And please avoid terms like "херню" (bullsh*t for those reading us), since it is obviously a personal attack. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 19:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Это именно персональная атака и угрозы в нарушение всех полисов Википедии (see WP:NPA). Участник, разместивший это, не имеет никакого права делать. Он не должен делать заявлений в таком вызывающем и недружественном. К тому же, разместивший эту угрозу пользователь, более чем никто. Он не администратор - он хам. Да и администрар не может так направо и налево разбрасывать угрозы. Относительно согласованности по Голодомору, то это мягко говоря неправда. Дискуссия на эту тему идет уже довольно долго на странице обсуждения статьи и до согласия там еще очень далеко. В свою очередь, я могу порекомендовать А4 не совершать значительные редакции статей без предварительного обсуждения. --Yakudza 19:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
-
А де можна поскаржитись на свавілля адмінів? Щодо правила 24 годин - тут я дійсно порушив (я думав, що відлік ведеться від 0:00 до 23:59). А от стосовно "вандалізму" User talk:Sebbeng - це типове свавілля. --A4 00:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Можливо, що не варто скаржитись. Спробуй написати на сторінку адміна, можливо він просто не розібрався. А що ти можеш писати заблокованим на своїй сторінці? --Yakudza 01:31, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Скаржитися треба. Не поскаржитися - нічого не зміниться - це Америка. You should press charges, otherwise nothing will be changed.--Vladyslav Savelo 06:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User_talk:Sebbeng, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. TheQuandry 18:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Holodomor
(aeropagitica) 19:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- I do not think that made the vandalism. You mistakenned. --Yakudza 20:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- It was a three revert rule violation, actually. -- Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 20:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Привіт Андрію, не варто було витирати попередження від адміна (aeropagitica), а тільки персональні атаки від того Sebbeng. Бо там нічого крім персональних атак не було. --Yakudza 20:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Block
Per the discussion on ANI, I've blocked you for a week. Yanksox 05:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Block per WP:BOT
You have been blocked for running an unauthorised bot. Please place an {{unblock}} request once the bot is shut down. Agathoclea 01:14, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Now unblocked. Please wait for approval until you use the bot on your new bot account. Agathoclea 23:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Approved
I've approved your bot for operations. —Mets501 (talk) 23:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] A4Bot
Dear Mets501, You are not right about User:A4bot. Here you wtore that the username A4Bot is inappropriate, but it is not true. Here this bot was approved for operations. As you can see the name A4bot was quite acceptible for my bot. Please don't disturb me with incorrect remarks ever more. Thank you for understanding, regards --A4 13:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think you're a bit confused. I'm the one who approved your bot, and never said anything about it being inappropriate. To avoid messages such as the one you received by Ciphershort on your bot's talk page make sure to only make real edits under your real username and only make bot edits under your bot username. —Mets501 (talk) 15:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Unlegitime blocking by User:Alex Bakharev
User:Alex Bakharev blocked my IP adress 77.123.148.219 with a reason "because your IP address was recently used by "A4bot". The reason given for A4bot's block is: "unauthorized bot".
This reason is not true! Here my bot have alredy got a flag (Here is a file log), thus it is not "unauthorized". Please unblock me. --A4 00:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Now unblocked.
Please note that your bots edits don't show the bot bit. I might take that up with the b'crat that gave you bot-status. On a further note - there is some ongoing dispute about the status of the ru-sib wiki. Agathoclea 00:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you please comment on my request at WP:ANI#War of the Bots, regarding ru-sib interwiki links? Thanks, Fut.Perf. ☼ 23:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Problem with A4bot
Hi, on a different note (entirely unrelated to the ru-sib issue): there seems to be a small technical bug in your bot. Regarding edits like this [2], please configure the bot in such a way that it won't make changes to pages in the "Template:" namespace. Or if it does, make sure that it includes all wikilinks added to Templates within <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags. Otherwise, all pages that include the template will have the template's interwiki link displayed themselves. For instance, after it changed the Template:User uk, all user pages of Ukrainian users were displaying interwiki links to the corresponding babel pages on other wikis. Thank you, Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Dead Interwiki Links in India
I've been deleting the interwiki deadlinks from the India article, but your bot keeps adding them (okay, he can't know). Is there a way to prevent it from adding them? There were about 40 interwiki links that lead to empty articles or candidates for speedy delete in other Wikipedias, that will often not be deleted in the near future. — N-true 02:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm terribly sorry, I don't know how it caused. Possibly there was incorrect interwiki's in some others wikipedias. But it's not true that my bot keeps adding. It happened only once [3] --A4 10:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Well, I thought it might keep readding it if I simply removed the links again, so I didn't do anything. The problem is, that the links aren't realldy dead, but just lead to empty pages or pages with no valuable content... or pages that are supposed to be deleted. Is there a way, maybe, to prevent A4bot from adding interwiki links to the India article? — N-true 15:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
-
- I'm not sure, I don't know much about bots and I'm not an expert on admins' work... but there's a message on your bot's talk page, that might explain it (not sure, though). I also don't know how to find out who blocked your bot; sorry. — N-true 03:18, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
-
-
[edit] WTF?
Your bot removed a perfectly good link to the Hebrew page on the English page for Regions of Turkey. WTF? Rarelibra 18:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, it was mistake. What is WTF? --A4 06:19, 5 April 2007 (UTC)