Talk:Aérospatiale Alouette III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

France Portal

Aérospatiale Alouette III is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France and Monaco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.

Military history WikiProject (Rated Start-Class)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (nations and regions):
	French military history task force

Aviation WikiProject (Rated Start-Class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Aviation, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles related to aviation. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Aviation Portal

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
(comments)

Additional information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related WikiProjects and/or task forces:
	Rotorcraft task force

[edit] Merge IAR 316

Support. Seems to be only a license-built aircraft and there is precedent to cover those aircraft under the variant they were license-built as, unless there is a large amount of unique coverage. - BillCJ 01:41, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
Support. Guess I forgot to throw my own vote in here. A scrap of an article that simply refers back to information that is in this article. It begs to be merged! --Born2flie 02:10, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Support. Seems reasonable to merge - the IAR article doesn't add much new information anyway.Nigel Ish 18:04, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose Although the article does not currently cover much new material, I think there is potential for some expansion, espiecially considering several Romanian varients that are unique to IAR (including two gunship versions). I would be willing to help expand the article a little, but I will need some time, not much but a little, perhaps a week. I suggest we should wait until then to make a final decision.SAWGunner89 15:44, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm prepared to wait until at least 8 April 2007. --Born2flie 22:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Oppose I have the same opinion like SAWGunner89.The IAR 316 is a quite popular helicopter in Romania and I strongly oppose the merge of this article with the Alouette III. I will also try to expand this article. Eurocopter Tigre , 19:27 16 March 2007 (UTC)