User talk:84.208.99.96
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Final remarks to clear away accusations against me
Since material from this page appears on Google, it is important for me to counteract here at the tope of the page the slander against me by SSS108, so that one will not be so easily misled by his voluminous writings against me. Though he never knew me personally, he has a personal grudge against me because I am one of the most prolific critics of Sai Baba and because I completely ignored him and his attacks on me for over 2 years, and his policy is to attack every critic of Sathya Sai Baba on every possible point. SSS108 claims he is not a devotee of the guru, but I am lying to that effect. I still can't see that I have called SSS108 a "devotee" of Sai Baba anywhere - I could not regard him as a practising devotee because he does not follow the very most basic teachings of fairness, control of language, extending sympathy to critics and not adherence to the truth. That I have mentioned Sai Baba as 'his guru' somewhere is not surprising, since he spends most of every day defending this God-guru and his organisation by means fair and foul on the Internet, while having claimed at the bottom of apparently every page of his huge website that he is 'neutral'! More than that, for years he openly admitted that he believed Sai Baba is a sexual abuser!! (See http://www.saibabaexpose.com/JoeFAQ.htm) I leave it to others to draw their own conclusions as to why SSS108 claims not to be a devotee. "Disgruntled and angry" is a mantra of the Sai Organisation about apostates - encouraged by Sai Baba's own statements against his critics as 'jealous', 'envious' and other such attempts at damage-limitation by followers who found out the facts and left him. SSS108 repeats this, thus virtually claiming to know my mind better than myself. I am not 'disgruntled' or 'angry', but am carrying out a duty to inform the public. I have a task set for me by life events, to expose what I have discovered despite my former great faith in Sai Baba so as to protect all people from the same deceptions, waste of time, energy, money and the various and many extremely serious consequences hundreds of former devotees have suffered, including a number of infamous murders, suicides and serious traumas from [alleged] sexual abuses by Sathya Sai Baba.
SSS108 repeatedly added onto my personal Wiki page links to his defamatory web pages about me (which he was nonetheless forced to remove according to Wikipedia rules) and subsequently made an all-out attack on practically every fact stated about me on that page! In that he failed completely. SSS108 has been banned indefinitely from Wikipedia for another personal attack he made against an arbitrator, but was allowed a comment to the banning - whereupon he stated that he is "disengaging from Wikipedia". Here I rest my case. ProEdits 12:19, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] For clarification
This userpage arose because I had not yet learned to sign in with a username, so my IP at that time (which my server changes now and again) was 84.208.99.96. I shall no longer use this page. However, I am inclined to add here - in the exact words of an infamous former Wiki-editor "For resons of transparency, I am the webmaster for the following site:" http://home.no.net/rrpriddy/Nos/ and direct anyone interested to the Wiki biographical page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Priddy ProEdits 11:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent, as you did with User:SSS108. It may be seen as vandalism. 1568 22:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
O.K. My edit of that page was due to my not yet knowing enough about how this system works. In my haste I thought the user page was specifically related to the attempt by Gerald Moreno, a person who defames and stalks me throughout the web because I am a critic of his guru, Sathya Sai Baba (the self-declared God Incarnate, the Father who sent Jesus to earth, and the Deity of all Deities!). The specific page was one about the Norwegian philosopher Arne Næss, on which SSS108 - who is Gerald 'Joe' Moreno - tried to interfere simply because it is I who made an edit there. .. i.e. in childish tit-for-tat pique fashion, because he had taken a defeat (from Alan Kazlev) over his attempt to hi-jack the Robert Priddy Wiki page with a link to his slanderous web pages against me. Other persons with insight into the subject concerning Arne Næss have since replaced the material I put there, which Moreno removed.
--ProEdits 19:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- For starters, I am not a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor is he my Guru. This is a constant lie perpetuated by ProEdits (Robert Priddy) against me with no proof. The page about Arne Næss contained original research, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. ProEdits even called his material "original research" Ref. It is also important to point out that Robert Priddy (ProEdits) had a slanderous and defamatory link about Sathya Sai Baba on his Wikipedia article and used Alan Kazlev as a pawn to remove my link. Robert Priddy (ProEdits) has no less than 3 Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba sites on the internet and has no less than 6 websites deleted for defamatory content against Sathya Sai Baba. Priddy is obviously oblivious to Wikipedia's policies on original research and citing reliable sources. As one can see, ProEdits is highly polarized and is incapable of telling the truth and backing it up with any verfiable sources. He was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17/18 years and is now very disgruntled and angry at his former eulogy of Sathya Sai Baba as God Incarnate and the Avatar Of The Age. He even wrote a book about it. SSS108 talk-email 04:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I have not stated that SSS108 [Gerald Moreno] is a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, nor that he is Moreno's guru since he surprisingly declared this himself after some time about 2 years ago. However, the massive diatribes against all critics of Sathya Sai Baba by Gerald Moreno on four websites, several blogs and numerous bulletin boards - totally in defense of this guru -shows enough about Gerald Joe Moreno's obsessive attitudes and total bias. His claim that I have had 6 websites deleted for defamation is not true, simply. There is NO PROOF of this copntrived allegation - and I have never been informed by any web server of having defamed anyone, which would be normal practice, for then I would obviously have reacted... not least because all the materials about Sai Baba I had on those websites are also on my more consolidated set of 3 websites now. This is simply an unsupported allegation by Moreno yet again. This matter will be addressed before long in another context.
Because Alan Kazlev chose to defend me against Moreno, he wants to imagine I use him as "as a pawn", thus trying maliciously to attribute what Kazlev wrote to me! How far will Moreno go to pervert facts, one wonders? Moreno does not know me, or realise therefore that I am not "disgruntled" or "angry", which words are the standard defence of the Sai Organisation against all critics - it is applied willy-nilly because they can't accept the fact that Sai Baba has actually been so widely exposed as a fraud. The fact is, having been deceived so thoroughly for so long by Sathya Sai Baba on many counts, I naturally became very concerned to demonstrate his deceptions in the interests of the uninformed and innocent who may be trapped by them as I was. I decided to make known the very widespread evidence that has been posted by scores of former devotees against him after they - like myself - found out many things which show he is not what he claims and is practicing fraudulence and deception on his followers, and large number of alleged serial homosexual abuses by him.
Yes, I wrote a book about Sai Baba when I was as deluded about him as is Moreno now, but I have also written a much longer book explaining the reasons for my leaving him, entitled 'End of the Dream'. Moreno is totally polarised because he has only ever seen one side of the issue and has always been very peripheral to the Sai movement and what goes on there (as he claims, he is no follower or devotee). Yet I discovered much which he has not done. Despite what Moreno says, I have cited many verifiable sources - not least many of the untruths propagated by Sai Baba from his own published words (some examples at), so this is simply another untruth of the kind Moreno is trying to propagate daily all over the web. My main website gives access to all my writings concerning Sai Baba and Co. --84.208.99.96 10:12, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
I have removed the defamatory links posted [before this present entry] by the web stalker Gerald Moreno from this user page, as his links on the Robert Priddy Wiki page were also removed (by Wiki editor Alan Kazlev). --84.208.99.96 10:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Removing Robert Priddy's Anti-Sai website links critical of Sathya Sai Baba and containing original research in compliance with Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba SSS108 talk-email 20:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Robert Priddy (aka ProEdits aka 84.208.99.96) made a defamatory complaint against me on Angela's Wikipedia Talk Page: Reference.
- Since Priddy made his comment on the top of Angela's talk page (instead of the bottom where it should have been made) Angela moved Priddy's comment to the bottom of the page where it belonged: Reference.
- Because Angela moved the comment, Priddy (unable to find his previous comment) reposted it again: Reference.
- Without any proof, Priddy jumped to the worst case conspiratorial view and erroneously claimed that I removed his post. Priddy said, "You will see the determination of Moreno to stop you knowing what I wrote by the fact that he has deleted my request to you in your user paeg (see below on the discussion page). Just goes to emphasizse my point. Moreno is a full-time stalker and defamer. Robert Priddy (Refs: 01 - 02)
- That's right! Robert Priddy claimed I removed the text and insulted me as a "stalker" and "defamer" although Angela moved Priddy's comment herself. I never touched or edited that page!
- This the guy who is trying to portray himself as honest, sober and fair-minded. He defames me for his paranoid errors and is wholly unapologetic! SSS108 talk-email 01:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Angela Beesley is one of Wikipedia's top officials. She did not react with any remark suggesting my complaint was defamatory. I have also mailed her in confidence, just so you know! What a big deal you make of tiny matters, Moreno! So I posted on top and not below and she moved it! BIG DEAL JOE RIDES AGAIN! Or I thought you had deleted something because I was unacquainted with how to navigate Wikipedia at that time, so you yourself "jumped to the worst case conspiratorial view and erroneously claimed", not I. You must feel you are chronically short of arguments, poor fellow, and you certainly have hardly a single valid argument anywhere in your entire repertoire, which is why you have no other method than to turn all our comments back on us using the same words. You know damn well you are a stalker, that you phoned Sanjay's University and spread direct lies about him to his lecturers, which they discussed with Sanjay decided to ignore you totally for what you are. It is all documented and stored away. And you stalked Pittard by phoning his former partner to dig dirt on Barry, likewise you stalked John Purnell, Gabriel M. and the list goes on! That you can be such a hypocrite as to deny it almost surprises me now after all this time. I am honest and sober-minded - it is you who are patently dishonest and fanatical in your uncalled-for defence of Sai Baba and his fraudulence and worse crimes. I know these matters from numerous inside contacts, more contacting me all the time - two major sources with the last week! Don't woory - a huge dossier is being compiled for the future, as and when! I am pleased that the arbitration comes out so the Kreydick slander is unwarranted. The arbitration is hitting your edits and all you slander links too. Nice one! Now you can't even get your squalid web pages linked in? As planned, you have been effectively stopped in your tracks. Having begun, I have not finished with your attacks on me yet by a long chalk, so take care. One might say this is a case of a last chance to clean up your dirty tricks act.--84.208.99.96 15:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Putting your frothing-at-the-mouth rhetoric aside, you owe me an apology for falsely accusing me of something I did not do. Just as you falsely accused Freelanceresearch for being "banned from Wikipedia". Your lies keep building up and your wholly unapologetic behavior is reprehensible. SSS108 talk-email 15:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Any readers please not: It is not I, but Moreno who froths at the mouth unapologetically both here (above) and all over Yahoo groups and his disgusting web pages where he has contrived that I have applied to porn sites - a totally implausible and mean dirty trick. Moreno's links to that are now banned from Wikipedia, and good riddance! He has no point to make other than calling my error a 'lie', which it was not, as proven by my retraction and my explanation. But he WANTS to make it a 'lie', as usual. --84.208.99.96 19:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Stop Your Vandalism
Please stop vandalizing the Sathya Sai Baba article Ref. Blanking sections of the article without discussion when the material is referenced to a reliable and verifiable source is vandalism and you may be blocked from Wikipedia if you persist in this behavior. You have already been warned twice, the second time under ProEdits. SSS108 talk-email 15:33, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
I have not vandalised, certainly NOT removing anything without discussion, as you falsely claim (as usual). Are you telling this 'blatant untruth' consciously or is this manner endemic to your psyche (no need to reply!). I have given my reasons for removal of the offending materials. You can warn me 100 times, if you like.--84.208.99.96 19:44, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |